I was looking for optimizations, in this case some smaller methods for potential inlining in #1258 in RungeKuttaDoca.computeCovMat, and was curious about the indexing here, particularly theC.get(2,0/1):
|
cNext[3][0] = C.get(2,0)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,0)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,0)*sF.dtydq0 |
|
+ sF.dxdq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dxdtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dxdty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0); |
|
|
|
cNext[3][1] = C.get(2,1)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,1)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,1)*sF.dtydq0 |
|
+ sF.dydq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dydtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dydty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0); |
|
|
|
cNext[3][2] = sF.dtxdq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dtxdtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dtxdty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0); |
|
|
|
cNext[3][3] = sF.dtydq0 *(C.get(2,4)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,4)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,4)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dtydtx0*(C.get(2,2)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,2)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,2)*sF.dtydq0) |
|
+ sF.dtydty0*(C.get(2,3)*sF.dtydtx0+C.get(3,3)*sF.dtydty0+C.get(4,3)*sF.dtydq0); |
Is this snippet really correct relative to the previous 3 indices? Those do C.get(i,0/1).
I was looking for optimizations, in this case some smaller methods for potential inlining in #1258 in
RungeKuttaDoca.computeCovMat, and was curious about the indexing here, particularly theC.get(2,0/1):coatjava/reconstruction/dc/src/main/java/org/jlab/rec/dc/track/fit/RungeKuttaDoca.java
Lines 238 to 254 in 0e88d70
Is this snippet really correct relative to the previous 3 indices? Those do
C.get(i,0/1).