You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current architecture, all the ecalls are in the same group, and they are only identified by a platform_id and api_level.
Using this approach is quite standard in many platforms and VMs.
I proposed to separate ecalls in different modules, each identified by a module_id and module_version.
the VM would support a list of (module_id, module_version)
each app's manifest would specify the required modules, and the minimal required version for that module.
The discussion was here − no consensus reached so far on an approach.
I think it's important to decide before there are many implemented and deployed apps, as adding this feature later will not be possible without breaking compatibility.
In the current architecture, all the ecalls are in the same group, and they are only identified by a
platform_idandapi_level.Using this approach is quite standard in many platforms and VMs.
I proposed to separate ecalls in different modules, each identified by a
module_idandmodule_version.(module_id, module_version)The discussion was here − no consensus reached so far on an approach.
I think it's important to decide before there are many implemented and deployed apps, as adding this feature later will not be possible without breaking compatibility.