Skip to content

Preferred conventions for forks? #151

Description

@fredemmott

Hi,

I'm probably going to push a build of my fork (keeping a fork due to #128 (comment))

I don't want people to potentially be bothering you with problems with "FlashGBX v5.0.1" which are actually problems with my fork, not your code.

I was thinking of perhaps doing a PEP440/semver-style "FlashGBX v5.0.1+fredemmott.1", but open to whatever you prefer.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions