Five independent sol lanes ran an adversarial law-gap sweep over the composition surface (§§19–33) at master 6e46e8a (revision 21, A13–A19 operative), each with a distinct lens drawn from one historical lawful-stop class. Consolidated report with full byte citations: ~/m6-sol-lanes/e8-ops/sol-ce-law-gap-sweep-r21-2026-08-16.md (lane transcripts noted per lane). Purpose: batch the next several lawful stops into one cure instead of paying for them serially at ceremony time — filed now because no A20 draft lane exists yet.
CONFIRMED (each would be a future lawful stop)
Data-reality / §19.3.3 class — live R04 blockers:
- 46 of 818 complete-official prompts violate the singleton field-token rule. Witness: 1985
C68. resolves to both V11804 and V11805 → mandatory abort. A19's disposition law does not cure this class.
Supersession-map incompleteness (lane E, map ledger 34/34 rows reviewed):
2. A19 vs §§26.6.3/26.10.1 build order — A19 constructs purpose_mapping_rows before O_H (line 55784) while undisposed law requires O_H first (lines 50288, 51133); §33.7 disposes only the stale §19.3.3 anchor (line 56206).
3. §31.3 not joined to §28.2.1's iff-four-conditions operativity rule — the sole map link (line 55026) cites a nonexistent "A16 ratification demonstration" anchor. This is the seam class that caused the first repin stop; still open for every future amendment including A20.
4. §20.4.2's frozen Q5 era/proof shapes silently superseded twice by A19 (lines 55844, 55996; no covering §33.7 row) — first U == 0 build cannot satisfy both.
5. §25.6.6's literal interpreter token never disposed by A18 (line 48137 vs 55404; §32.7 calls the gate unchanged at 55620) — neither possible command[0] satisfies both contracts. Same defect class as the A18 CI-portability cure, one layer deeper.
Ordinal/pin class (lane A):
6. Terminal-A19 pinned fixtures repeat the A17 hardcoded-domain pattern at revision 22+.
7. A19-only implementation-pin resolution (breaks on the next amendment's pins).
8. R06's 223-test count is unbound to any pinned identity.
A20 charter conflict (lane D):
9. A20's chartered single-blob lifecycle law conflicts with §26.10.3 (lifecycle successors definable only post-certification). A20 as chartered is unratifiable without an express dormant-definitions supersession — otherwise lifecycle work needs an A21.
Key SUSPECTED (probes specified in the report)
- 15,428 prompts with zero field candidates — group by post-
O_P positive row to test for empty required reference unions.
- MD= ceiling 54,898 vs 59,424 diagnostic shadow — historical/current representation bridge unproved.
- §33.8 manifest forbids serializing
questionnaire_occurrence_rows that the global purpose rows appear to require (lines 56284 vs 27544).
- §31.3 verdict grammar: pinned validator silently requires LF + plain/comma decimals only (probed: space-grouped and CRLF forms abort) — enact an exact grammar.
Cleared (useful negatives)
§33.2 disposition totality over all 21,971 prompts (818/14/56/21,083); typed_value_unit lawfully resolvable via A10/§24 (sequencing question only); all active pins and both semantic-hash fixpoints verify at HEAD; A20 two-arm chronology satisfiable, incl. shared §31.3 receipt/verdict/operator-merge and the rev20→21→22→X→R05→R06 descendant order.
Recommendation
Fold cures 1–9 into the A20 draft (or an A20-pre batch amendment) before drafting starts — est. 3–4 avoided serial stop-and-cure ceremonies (~1–2 weeks of p50). Sweep findings are advisory; every claim carries byte citations for referee verification.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Five independent sol lanes ran an adversarial law-gap sweep over the composition surface (§§19–33) at master
6e46e8a(revision 21, A13–A19 operative), each with a distinct lens drawn from one historical lawful-stop class. Consolidated report with full byte citations:~/m6-sol-lanes/e8-ops/sol-ce-law-gap-sweep-r21-2026-08-16.md(lane transcripts noted per lane). Purpose: batch the next several lawful stops into one cure instead of paying for them serially at ceremony time — filed now because no A20 draft lane exists yet.CONFIRMED (each would be a future lawful stop)
Data-reality / §19.3.3 class — live R04 blockers:
C68.resolves to both V11804 and V11805 → mandatory abort. A19's disposition law does not cure this class.Supersession-map incompleteness (lane E, map ledger 34/34 rows reviewed):
2. A19 vs §§26.6.3/26.10.1 build order — A19 constructs
purpose_mapping_rowsbeforeO_H(line 55784) while undisposed law requiresO_Hfirst (lines 50288, 51133); §33.7 disposes only the stale §19.3.3 anchor (line 56206).3. §31.3 not joined to §28.2.1's iff-four-conditions operativity rule — the sole map link (line 55026) cites a nonexistent "A16 ratification demonstration" anchor. This is the seam class that caused the first repin stop; still open for every future amendment including A20.
4. §20.4.2's frozen Q5 era/proof shapes silently superseded twice by A19 (lines 55844, 55996; no covering §33.7 row) — first
U == 0build cannot satisfy both.5. §25.6.6's literal interpreter token never disposed by A18 (line 48137 vs 55404; §32.7 calls the gate unchanged at 55620) — neither possible
command[0]satisfies both contracts. Same defect class as the A18 CI-portability cure, one layer deeper.Ordinal/pin class (lane A):
6. Terminal-A19 pinned fixtures repeat the A17 hardcoded-domain pattern at revision 22+.
7. A19-only implementation-pin resolution (breaks on the next amendment's pins).
8. R06's 223-test count is unbound to any pinned identity.
A20 charter conflict (lane D):
9. A20's chartered single-blob lifecycle law conflicts with §26.10.3 (lifecycle successors definable only post-certification). A20 as chartered is unratifiable without an express dormant-definitions supersession — otherwise lifecycle work needs an A21.
Key SUSPECTED (probes specified in the report)
O_Ppositive row to test for empty required reference unions.questionnaire_occurrence_rowsthat the global purpose rows appear to require (lines 56284 vs 27544).Cleared (useful negatives)
§33.2 disposition totality over all 21,971 prompts (818/14/56/21,083);
typed_value_unitlawfully resolvable via A10/§24 (sequencing question only); all active pins and both semantic-hash fixpoints verify at HEAD; A20 two-arm chronology satisfiable, incl. shared §31.3 receipt/verdict/operator-merge and the rev20→21→22→X→R05→R06 descendant order.Recommendation
Fold cures 1–9 into the A20 draft (or an A20-pre batch amendment) before drafting starts — est. 3–4 avoided serial stop-and-cure ceremonies (~1–2 weeks of p50). Sweep findings are advisory; every claim carries byte citations for referee verification.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code