From 817989da5ac415fafcc45bd6ccf0c850e2c6940b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juraj Kapsz <hi@jurajkapsz.sk>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:04:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: use const instead of let in code example in part4b

This better reflects the intent of the example, follows modern JavaScript conventions, and avoids suggesting the `let` when reassignment of the variable binding is not intended.
---
 src/content/4/en/part4b.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/content/4/en/part4b.md b/src/content/4/en/part4b.md
index 6da9ce905dc..005ece0ffae 100644
--- a/src/content/4/en/part4b.md
+++ b/src/content/4/en/part4b.md
@@ -894,8 +894,8 @@ Promise.all executes the promises it receives in parallel. If the promises need
 beforeEach(async () => {
   await Note.deleteMany({})
 
-  for (let note of helper.initialNotes) {
-    let noteObject = new Note(note)
+  for (const note of helper.initialNotes) {
+    const noteObject = new Note(note)
     await noteObject.save()
   }
 })