Commit 9fa3e53
committed
plan: C4's 'does not reproduce' was measured on a different version
The record said C4 (`memset_pattern16`) was closed and did not reproduce.
That measurement used a newer runtime. `lsp-mcpp-private`'s CI, pinned to
`openkal-llvm-runtime@0.10.0`, still fails on it today:
ld64.lld: error: undefined symbol: memset_pattern16
So the correct statement is "a runtime release fixed it", not "it does not
reproduce". For a consumer still on the old pin those differ completely: the
first gives an action, the second sends them looking for something
intermittent that is not there. A defect's non-reproduction has to name the
version it did not reproduce on.
The same CI run surfaced something harder. That pin is mcpp 2026.9.17.3 and
the index floor is 2026.9.18.3:
error: index requires mcpp >= 2026.9.18.3 but this is mcpp 2026.9.17.3 [E0006]
The index was closed to that client entirely, so none of its readings were
about this wave --- they were about not being able to open the index.1 parent d38b841 commit 9fa3e53
1 file changed
Lines changed: 27 additions & 1 deletion
Lines changed: 27 additions & 1 deletion
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
443 | 443 | | |
444 | 444 | | |
445 | 445 | | |
| 446 | + | |
| 447 | + | |
| 448 | + | |
| 449 | + | |
| 450 | + | |
| 451 | + | |
| 452 | + | |
| 453 | + | |
| 454 | + | |
| 455 | + | |
| 456 | + | |
| 457 | + | |
| 458 | + | |
| 459 | + | |
| 460 | + | |
| 461 | + | |
| 462 | + | |
| 463 | + | |
| 464 | + | |
| 465 | + | |
| 466 | + | |
| 467 | + | |
| 468 | + | |
| 469 | + | |
| 470 | + | |
| 471 | + | |
446 | 472 | | |
447 | 473 | | |
448 | 474 | | |
| |||
739 | 765 | | |
740 | 766 | | |
741 | 767 | | |
742 | | - | |
| 768 | + | |
743 | 769 | | |
744 | 770 | | |
745 | 771 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments