You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an adopter uninstalling Nexus, I want a verb that removes the components, so that removing the package does not leave a component set behind that nothing tracks.
Acceptance Criteria
Given an installed component set, when the removal verb runs, then no Nexus-namespaced component file remains at the configuration directory.
Given that same location holds files that are not Nexus-namespaced, when the verb runs, then they are untouched.
Given the verb runs, when its output is read, then it states that it must run before the package itself is removed, and why.
Given the install location points at a checkout's authored tree rather than a copy, when the removal verb runs, then it does not delete the checkout's files.
Given removal is expressed as a mirror of an empty payload, when it runs, then it completes normally rather than failing on an absent payload directory — the primitive's throw-on-missing-directory behaviour is either satisfied or explicitly changed, and which is stated.
Notes
Removal is the same primitive with an empty payload. The ordering — remove the components first, then the package — matters because the verb ships inside the package, and because the package manager has no record of a payload that was copied into the configuration directory. This is the same verify-before-remove ordering the close migration already uses.
AC4 is the sharp one: the checkout-pointing mode means the removal verb can be pointed at a maintainer's source tree, and deleting that would be catastrophic and silent.
As an adopter uninstalling Nexus, I want a verb that removes the components, so that removing the package does not leave a component set behind that nothing tracks.
Acceptance Criteria
Notes
Removal is the same primitive with an empty payload. The ordering — remove the components first, then the package — matters because the verb ships inside the package, and because the package manager has no record of a payload that was copied into the configuration directory. This is the same verify-before-remove ordering the close migration already uses.
AC4 is the sharp one: the checkout-pointing mode means the removal verb can be pointed at a maintainer's source tree, and deleting that would be catastrophic and silent.