From 3c108d947a624e135d08d83b7ea367ac8e549d98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jules Bertholet <julesbertholet@quoi.xyz>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 19:07:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix mistake in the specification of Arabic lam-alef ligature

Brings the text in line with what we actually do,
and test for in `test_arabic_lam_alef()`.
Notably affects U+1E94B
---
 src/lib.rs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/lib.rs b/src/lib.rs
index 6d8b38e..87debbc 100644
--- a/src/lib.rs
+++ b/src/lib.rs
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 //!        ligatures, the insertion of any number of [`'\u{200D}'` ZERO WIDTH JOINER](https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode16.0.0/core-spec/chapter-23/#G23126)s
 //!        will not affect the width.
 //!      - **[Arabic]**: A character sequence consisting of one character with [`Joining_Group`]`=Lam`,
-//!        followed by any number of characters with [`Joining_Type`]`=Transparent`, followed by one character
+//!        followed by any number of zero-width characters with [`Joining_Type`]`=Transparent`, followed by one character
 //!        with [`Joining_Group`]`=Alef`, has total width 1. For example: `لا`‎, `لآ`‎, `ڸا`‎, `لٟٞأ`
 //!      - **[Buginese]**: `"\u{1A15}\u{1A17}\u{200D}\u{1A10}"` (<a, -i> ya, `ᨕᨗ‍ᨐ`) has total width 1.
 //!      - **[Hebrew]**: `"א\u{200D}ל"` (Alef-Lamed, `א‍ל`) has total width 1.