|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +name: Performance Improvement Plan |
| 3 | +about: Comprehensive plan for AutoQuery performance optimizations |
| 4 | +title: '[PERFORMANCE] Performance Improvement Plan Implementation' |
| 5 | +labels: enhancement, performance |
| 6 | +assignees: '' |
| 7 | +--- |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## 概述 (Overview) |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +本 Issue 追蹤 AutoQuery 函式庫的效能改進計畫實施進度。 |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +This issue tracks the implementation progress of the AutoQuery library performance improvement plan. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## 相關文件 (Related Documentation) |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +- 📄 [Performance Improvement Plan (繁體中文)](/PERFORMANCE_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN.md) |
| 18 | +- 📄 [Performance Improvement Plan (English)](/docs/PERFORMANCE_IMPROVEMENT_PLAN_EN.md) |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## 實施進度 (Implementation Progress) |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +### Phase 1: Quick Wins (1-2 months) |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +- [ ] **String Parsing Optimization** - Reduce GC pressure and improve parsing performance |
| 25 | + - Use `Span<char>` for zero-allocation string parsing |
| 26 | + - Cache parsing results for `Fields` and `Sort` parameters |
| 27 | + - Estimated impact: 30-40% reduction in GC pressure, 40-50% faster string processing |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +- [ ] **Expression Tree Compilation Cache Warming** - Reduce cold start latency |
| 30 | + - Implement warmup mechanism during application startup |
| 31 | + - Use `Lazy<T>` to ensure single compilation per expression |
| 32 | + - Add API for manual pre-compilation of common queries |
| 33 | + - Estimated impact: 50-70% reduction in first-query latency |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +- [ ] **Expand Benchmark Test Suite** - Better performance visibility |
| 36 | + - Add cold start performance tests |
| 37 | + - Add concurrency tests |
| 38 | + - Add memory performance tests |
| 39 | + - Add large dataset tests (100K+, 1M+ records) |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +### Phase 2: Core Improvements (2-3 months) |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +- [ ] **Batch Filter Optimization** - Improve complex query performance |
| 44 | + - Implement expression optimizer with constant folding |
| 45 | + - Add dead code elimination |
| 46 | + - Implement query plan caching |
| 47 | + - Estimated impact: 20-30% improvement for complex queries |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +- [ ] **Memory Pooling** - Reduce GC pressure |
| 50 | + - Use `ArrayPool<T>` and `MemoryPool<T>` for temporary buffers |
| 51 | + - Implement object pools for heavy objects |
| 52 | + - Estimated impact: 25-35% reduction in GC pressure |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +- [ ] **AsyncEnumerable Support** - Better async/await integration |
| 55 | + - Add `IAsyncEnumerable<T>` support |
| 56 | + - Implement async query extension methods |
| 57 | + - Add cancellation token support |
| 58 | + - Estimated impact: Better memory usage for large datasets |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +### Phase 3: Advanced Features (3-6 months) |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +- [ ] **Source Generator Integration** - Eliminate runtime overhead |
| 63 | + - Implement C# Source Generator |
| 64 | + - Generate compile-time optimized code |
| 65 | + - Add opt-in mechanism |
| 66 | + - Estimated impact: Eliminate runtime compilation overhead |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- [ ] **Smart Caching Strategy** - Prevent unbounded cache growth |
| 69 | + - Implement LRU/LFU caching |
| 70 | + - Add configurable cache size limits |
| 71 | + - Add cache statistics API |
| 72 | + - Estimated impact: Prevent memory leaks in long-running apps |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +- [ ] **Query Plan Visualization Tools** - Better debugging |
| 75 | + - Implement query plan visualization |
| 76 | + - Add performance analysis API |
| 77 | + - Add diagnostic logging |
| 78 | + - Estimated impact: Improved developer experience |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +### Phase 4: Specialized Optimizations (As Needed) |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +- [ ] **SIMD Optimization** - Hardware acceleration |
| 83 | + - Identify SIMD-friendly hot paths |
| 84 | + - Implement vectorized filtering operations |
| 85 | + - Estimated impact: 2-4x improvement in specific scenarios |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +- [ ] **Custom Scenario Optimizations** - Target specific use cases |
| 88 | + - Identify common usage patterns |
| 89 | + - Implement specialized optimizations |
| 90 | + - TBD based on user feedback |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## 貢獻指南 (How to Contribute) |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +如果您想貢獻其中任何一項改進,請: |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +If you'd like to contribute any of these improvements, please: |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +1. 在此 Issue 下留言表達意願 / Comment on this issue to express interest |
| 99 | +2. 開啟新的 Issue 討論具體實作細節 / Open a new issue to discuss implementation details |
| 100 | +3. 提交 PR 時請包含: |
| 101 | + - Benchmark 測試結果比較 / Benchmark comparison results |
| 102 | + - 效能測試報告 / Performance test report |
| 103 | + - 相關文件更新 / Documentation updates |
| 104 | + - 確保所有測試通過 / Ensure all tests pass |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +## 成功指標 (Success Metrics) |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +每項優化都將測量: |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +- 效能提升百分比 / Performance improvement percentage |
| 111 | +- 記憶體影響 / Memory impact |
| 112 | +- 向後相容性 / Backward compatibility |
| 113 | +- 開發者體驗 / Developer experience |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +## 相關資源 (Resources) |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +- [BenchmarkDotNet Documentation](https://benchmarkdotnet.org/) |
| 118 | +- [.NET Performance Tips](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/performance/) |
| 119 | +- [Expression Trees Best Practices](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/programming-guide/concepts/expression-trees/) |
| 120 | +- [C# Source Generators](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/roslyn-sdk/source-generators-overview) |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +## 更新日誌 (Update Log) |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +<!-- 請在這裡記錄重要的進度更新 --> |
| 125 | +<!-- Please record important progress updates here --> |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +- 2026-02-04: 創建效能改進計畫 / Created performance improvement plan |
0 commit comments