Fix a clause doubled in the deprecation docstring - #200
Open
ealt wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Reads "for the / and contract and". Two scripted edits landed on the same sentence during the protocol rename in #198, and it merged before I caught it. Cosmetic, but it is the docstring of the package the deprecation is about, so it is what anyone following the notice reads first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XrVfBeUFhMToafrbgdDGUo
|
Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed. Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One-line docs fix. Follow-up to #198.
The module docstring of
simplexity/generative_processescurrently reads:Two scripted edits landed on the same sentence during the protocol rename in #198, and #198 merged
before I noticed. Cosmetic, but it is the docstring of the package the deprecation is about — the
first thing anyone following the
PendingDeprecationWarningreads.I swept the 1,927 lines #198 added for the same class of damage; this was the only instance.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01XrVfBeUFhMToafrbgdDGUo