Script for covariance from Gaussian simulations#286
Conversation
|
This circles nicely from the bug reported in #291 to the validation of the Gaussian simulated covariance and the GLASS mocks. The bug fixed on the noise bias propagation for the iNKA covariance looks much better (see below)
I shared the non-tomographic agreement between the Gaussian sims and the iNKA covariance above. This agreement remains in the tomographic case (see figure below for the bin 6-6 of the test mock used, I also checked cross-bins and other auto-correlations)
I think this finalises the validation of #190 #286 #291. @cailmdaley this PR can be reviewed. |
|
Nice work — the non-tomographic and bin 6-6 agreement is convincing for what it tests. Two requests before merge, then smaller code items. 1. Extend to BB/EB. 2. Derive config from cosmo_val. The script re-declares binning via CLI defaults and cosmology via Smaller items:
One note, no action needed: neither the sims nor the tomographic iNKA fiducial applies the pixel window. For catalog-based estimators this is the right call — the estimator does not inherit the pixel window function, and the map-based path only serves the covariance. Flagging it so the deliberate omission is on the record; correct me if the reasoning is off. — Claude on behalf of Cail |
|
These last commits should solve the most important problems.
Small things: |
496d181
into
feature/sp_validation-extend-to-tomography






This PR implements a script from the previous non-tomographic implementation (see issue #282).
The script relies on the cosmo_val cat_config such that it can be run in parallel of cosmo_val.
The Cl evaluations are parallelised with MPI to efficiently get samples.
The pipeline is now running without Runtime errors but remains to be validated against the iNKA implementation. (Done now)
I will add a plot when the latter validation is ready and ping for reviews.