feat: Report Truncated Output Artifacts by danny-avila · Pull Request #199 · LibreChat-AI/code-interpreter

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T14:57:15Z

Summary

I added an explicit response marker for supported output artifacts that the sandbox detects but cannot include in files[], closing the ambiguity reported in #198.

Reported output omissions caused by the file-count cap, nesting depth, path length, file size, and unreadable filesystem entries.
Included per-reason counts, a detected omission count, and up to 20 relative paths so clients can match expected writes without creating an unbounded response.
Preserved intentional filtering for unsupported extensions, hidden runtime directories, and unchanged session files without reporting false failures.
Propagated artifact_truncation through ordinary execution, worker settlement, blocking polling, programmatic responses, and privacy-safe execution summaries.
Documented the response contract and added coverage for count, depth, path-length, size, worker propagation, and safe logging.

Closes #198.

Change Type

Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
This change requires a documentation update
Documentation update

Testing

Ran bun test api/src/walker.test.ts service/src/service/blocking-poll.test.ts service/src/execution-log.test.ts (65 passed).
Ran npm run build --prefix api successfully.
Ran git diff --check successfully.
Ran TypeScript checks in both changed workspaces. They reached existing unrelated errors in API route/tests and service egress/replay files; no failures referenced the changed files.

Test Configuration:

macOS
Bun 1.3.13
Node/npm workspace dependencies installed locally

Checklist

My code adheres to this project's style guidelines
I have performed a self-review of my own code
I have commented in any complex areas of my code
I have made pertinent documentation changes
My changes do not introduce new warnings
I have written tests demonstrating that my changes are effective or that my feature works
Local unit tests pass with my changes

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T14:57:29Z

@codex review

Please review the current PR head 6c43aeb. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-09-14T14:57:53Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-14T16:17:45.454012Z	`c842020`	Manual request

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6c43aebc10

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T15:12:13Z

@codex review

Please review the current PR head ccbd798. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ccbd7982ac

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T15:26:44Z

@codex review

Please review the current PR head a9e6bb6. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a9e6bb64aa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T15:36:09Z

@codex review

Please review the current PR head 2bfe84a. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2bfe84a42b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T15:43:14Z

@codex review

Please review the current PR head ba2c778. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-09-14T15:50:23Z

Codex Review: Something went wrong. Try again later by commenting “@codex review”.

Unknown error

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T15:55:05Z

@codex review

Retry after the prior review service failed with an unknown error. Please review the current PR head ba2c778. Confirm that this exact commit is the reviewed commit and ignore findings that apply only to earlier heads.

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ba2c778eb1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T16:07:29Z

@codex review commit 24279020f12f87934fb22c85c70e22e026392e0a

chatgpt-codex-connector

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2427902240

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

danny-avila · 2026-09-14T16:14:02Z

@codex review commit c842020

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-09-14T16:17:44Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: c842020561

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

feat: report truncated output artifacts

6c43aeb

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread service/src/service/programmatic-router.ts

fix: classify omitted artifacts precisely

ccbd798

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

fix: preserve artifact scan invariants

a9e6bb6

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

fix: bound depth truncation probes

2bfe84a

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

fix: bound capped directory enumeration

ba2c778

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

fix: constrain truncation probes across the job

2427902

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot reviewed Sep 14, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread api/src/job.ts

Comment thread api/src/job.ts Outdated

fix: stop exhausted artifact probes

c842020

danny-avila changed the title ~~🛰️ feat: Report Truncated Output Artifacts~~ feat: Report Truncated Output Artifacts Sep 14, 2026

danny-avila merged commit e4815fa into main Sep 14, 2026
10 checks passed

Uh oh!

Conversation

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Change Type

Testing

Test Configuration:

Checklist

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

💡 Codex Review

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

danny-avila commented Sep 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 14, 2026 •

edited

Loading