Skip to content

tool function: metastep or not #3

Description

@MireilleBF

The call to ravel() in the student1 notebook is categorized differently depending on the context. However, this operation is primarily utilitarian.

Should we treat it separately or not?

It appears several times in the notebooks. We can see that it is
(1) bad practice when applied multiple times to the same example
(2) used for different purposes.

Un autre exemple avec MAX où il dit other tout le temps et une fois où il est contaminé par un print voir question dédiée.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions