Skip to content

chore: refresh committed .local-dev-keys snapshot#128

Merged
pselle merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/refresh-local-dev-keys
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

chore: refresh committed .local-dev-keys snapshot#128
pselle merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/refresh-local-dev-keys

Conversation

@pselle

@pselle pselle commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • The .local-dev-keys snapshot committed on main predates feat(e2e): standin Suite 5+6 — Rust provider-stack alongside Deno #123 (Rust provider-stack standin), which added a STANDIN_PP role to setup-keys.sh's ROLES map
  • All keys derive deterministically from the shared local-dev master seed (lib/master-seed.ts), and up.sh regenerates this file on every run — this PR just brings the checked-in copy back in sync with what setup-keys.sh actually outputs today
  • No values changed for any pre-existing role (ADMIN, PP, OPEX, PAY_ADMIN, PAY_SERVICE, ALICE, BOB); only the new STANDIN_PP_PK/STANDIN_PP_SK pair and the regeneration timestamp are added

Test plan

  • Diffed against a fresh ./setup-keys.sh run — output matches this file exactly (modulo timestamp)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The committed snapshot predates #123, which added a STANDIN_PP role
to setup-keys.sh's ROLES map (Rust provider-stack standin). Since
up.sh runs setup-keys.sh on every invocation and all keys derive
deterministically from the shared local-dev master seed, this just
brings the checked-in file back in sync with what setup-keys.sh
actually produces today — no key values for existing roles changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pselle pselle requested a review from AquiGorka July 1, 2026 18:02

@AquiGorka AquiGorka left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔐 🦀

@pselle pselle merged commit 69e2ee2 into main Jul 7, 2026
10 checks passed
@pselle pselle deleted the chore/refresh-local-dev-keys branch July 7, 2026 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants