Skip to content

Fates exercise#359

Merged
dabail10 merged 22 commits into
NCAR:mainfrom
adrifoster:fates_exercise
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

Fates exercise#359
dabail10 merged 22 commits into
NCAR:mainfrom
adrifoster:fates_exercise

Conversation

@adrifoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I added some FATES exercises.

@dabail10

dabail10 commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @adrifoster. Thanks for these. It does look like you have a few conflicts that need to be resolved before we can merge this. Let me know if you need help.

Comment thread notebooks/challenge/clm_ctsm/clm_ctsm.ipynb Outdated
@adrifoster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@dabail10 I believe this is ready now??

@dabail10 dabail10 merged commit f759447 into NCAR:main Jul 9, 2026

@ekluzek ekluzek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a couple suggestions to make that are simple.

"- FATES: The FATES cohort vegetation model instead of big leaf, either SP or BGC\n",
"\n",
"We will use the Satellite Phenology option for our control case."
"We will use the Satellite Phenology option for our first simulation."

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was thinking "control case" is good to use, because then it's the one that the others are compared to. What is the thinking about this change?

"metadata": {},
"source": [
"We can use a different I compset: IHistClm50BgcCrop. This experiment is a 20th century transient run using GSWP3v1 and the biogeochemistry model including crops."
"We can use a different I compset: IHistClm60BgcCrop. This experiment is a 20th century transient run using CRUJRA and the biogeochemistry model including crops.\n",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually this compset is still GSWP3v1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"We can use a different I compset: IHistClm60BgcCrop. This experiment is a 20th century transient run using CRUJRA and the biogeochemistry model including crops.\n",
"We can use a different I compset: IHistClm60BgcCrop. This experiment is a 20th century transient run using GSWP3 forcing and the biogeochemistry model including crops.\n",

"- You will run a control simulation and two experimental simulations. \n",
"- You will modify netcdf input files. \n",
"- You will use simple, command line netcdf tools to evaluate how the experiments differ from the control simulation."
"- You will be using the I2000Clm60Sp, IHistClm60BgcCrop, and I2000Clm60FatesSpCrujraRsGs compsets at the f19_f19_mt233 resolution.\n",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a note that the forcing changes between these three.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"- You will be using the I2000Clm60Sp, IHistClm60BgcCrop, and I2000Clm60FatesSpCrujraRsGs compsets at the f19_f19_mt233 resolution.\n",
"- You will be using the I2000Clm60Sp, IHistClm60BgcCrop, and I2000Clm60FatesSpCrujraRsGs compsets at the f19_f19_mt233 resolution.\n",
"- The first two use GSWP3 atmospheric forcing and the last uses CRUJRA-2024 forcing.\n",

@ekluzek

ekluzek commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Oh, never mind, it's already merged. I'll do those seperately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants