Skip to content

[DualPorosity] (5/5) Accept the supported dual-continuum keywords - #7351

Draft
arturcastiel wants to merge 2 commits into
OPM:masterfrom
arturcastiel:dualporo-sim-enable
Draft

[DualPorosity] (5/5) Accept the supported dual-continuum keywords#7351
arturcastiel wants to merge 2 commits into
OPM:masterfrom
arturcastiel:dualporo-sim-enable

Conversation

@arturcastiel

@arturcastiel arturcastiel commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Builds on #7350. Its commit is included in this diff and merges first; review only the last commit here.

What this does

Six keywords stop being rejected: DUALPORO, DUALPERM, NODPPM, SIGMA, SIGMAV,
DPGRID. Nothing else.

Why

Every pull request before this one was inert — parsing, representation, guards and policy, with
the keywords still refused. This is the single change that lets a user run a dual-continuum
deck, which makes it trivial to revert if anything is wrong.

Behavior impact

Flow accepts dual-continuum decks and simulates them.

Testing

The keyword gate in both directions: the six keywords absent from the unsupported list, and a
named subset of the wider family still present.

Requirements and limitations

  • Serial only, per the guard added in the previous pull request.
  • The matrix-fracture transfer contains no gravity term, so gravity-drainage recovery is not
    represented and those keywords remain rejected.
  • Wells should perforate the fracture half. A well completed in the matrix half will produce,
    but it bypasses the transfer this feature exists to model.

arturcastiel and others added 2 commits August 24, 2026 14:21
Co-authored-by: AXON <axon@arturcastiel.github.io>
Co-authored-by: AXON <axon@arturcastiel.github.io>
@arturcastiel arturcastiel changed the title [DualPorosity] Accept the supported dual-continuum keywords [DualPorosity] (5/5) Accept the supported dual-continuum keywords Aug 24, 2026
@arturcastiel arturcastiel added the manual:enhancement This is an enhancement/improvent that needs to be documented in the manual label Aug 24, 2026
@arturcastiel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jenkins build this please

@arturcastiel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jenkins build this please with opm-common=5318

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

manual:enhancement This is an enhancement/improvent that needs to be documented in the manual

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant