You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
data.quantecon.org needs someone with AWS console access to establish who owns the infrastructure its DNS points at, because the answer decides between "decommission at leisure" and "remove the DNS record promptly".
Observed state (2026-08-06, all independently verified)
Probe
Result
DNS
data.quantecon.org → A record 52.64.86.66 (AWS ap-southeast-2, Sydney)
Reverse DNS
52.64.86.66 → data.quantecon.org (rDNS is set by whoever holds the address, so this was configured deliberately at some point)
http://
301 → https://data.quantecon.org:443/
https://
TLS presents a certificate for *.dev.cloud.payok.com.au — a third party — so browsers fail with a certificate error before seeing any content
Behind the cert (curl -k)
server: awselb/2.0 returning 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable — an AWS load balancer with no healthy targets
So the name is dead as a service either way. The open question is whose load balancer is answering.
Why ownership is the deciding question
If the ELB/EIP is still in a QuantEcon-controlled AWS account, this is leftover infrastructure (the old NestJS box, per earlier notes): the third-party certificate would mean the LB is shared or its default listener certificate was changed, and the cleanup is to decommission it and release the address whenever convenient.
If it is not — if the address was released at some point and reallocated — then our A record is dangling on infrastructure someone else controls. A dangling record on a reassignable address is a takeover-shaped exposure, not just a dead page: whoever holds the address can serve arbitrary content under data.quantecon.org, including obtaining a valid certificate for it via HTTP-01 validation. In that case the A record should be removed promptly, independent of any future plans for the name.
The certificate observation is what raises the question: a QuantEcon-owned LB has no reason to present *.dev.cloud.payok.com.au.
What resolving this unblocks
data-lectures Phase 4 plans to serve the canonical lecture datasets at https://data.quantecon.org/lectures/<file> via GitHub Pages (custom domain), tracked in QuantEcon/data-lectures#37 (the DNS track) with the cutover runbook in QuantEcon/data-lectures#15. That work is gated on this DNS decision: the record needs to be confirmed decommissionable, then repointed to GitHub Pages. One acceptance criterion already recorded there: the new hosting must serve access-control-allow-origin: *, because lecture-wasm executes code cells in the reader's browser (data-lectures repoint rule 5; GitHub Pages satisfies this).
Asks
Someone with access to the relevant AWS account(s): confirm whether ELB/EIP 52.64.86.66 is QuantEcon-controlled.
data.quantecon.orgneeds someone with AWS console access to establish who owns the infrastructure its DNS points at, because the answer decides between "decommission at leisure" and "remove the DNS record promptly".Observed state (2026-08-06, all independently verified)
data.quantecon.org→ A record52.64.86.66(AWS ap-southeast-2, Sydney)52.64.86.66→data.quantecon.org(rDNS is set by whoever holds the address, so this was configured deliberately at some point)http://https://data.quantecon.org:443/https://*.dev.cloud.payok.com.au— a third party — so browsers fail with a certificate error before seeing any contentcurl -k)server: awselb/2.0returning 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable — an AWS load balancer with no healthy targetsSo the name is dead as a service either way. The open question is whose load balancer is answering.
Why ownership is the deciding question
If the ELB/EIP is still in a QuantEcon-controlled AWS account, this is leftover infrastructure (the old NestJS box, per earlier notes): the third-party certificate would mean the LB is shared or its default listener certificate was changed, and the cleanup is to decommission it and release the address whenever convenient.
If it is not — if the address was released at some point and reallocated — then our A record is dangling on infrastructure someone else controls. A dangling record on a reassignable address is a takeover-shaped exposure, not just a dead page: whoever holds the address can serve arbitrary content under
data.quantecon.org, including obtaining a valid certificate for it via HTTP-01 validation. In that case the A record should be removed promptly, independent of any future plans for the name.The certificate observation is what raises the question: a QuantEcon-owned LB has no reason to present
*.dev.cloud.payok.com.au.What resolving this unblocks
data-lecturesPhase 4 plans to serve the canonical lecture datasets athttps://data.quantecon.org/lectures/<file>via GitHub Pages (custom domain), tracked in QuantEcon/data-lectures#37 (the DNS track) with the cutover runbook in QuantEcon/data-lectures#15. That work is gated on this DNS decision: the record needs to be confirmed decommissionable, then repointed to GitHub Pages. One acceptance criterion already recorded there: the new hosting must serveaccess-control-allow-origin: *, becauselecture-wasmexecutes code cells in the reader's browser (data-lectures repoint rule 5; GitHub Pages satisfies this).Asks
52.64.86.66is QuantEcon-controlled.data.quantecon.orgA record immediately, and note the removal on Track Y (deferred): data.quantecon.org DNS + custom domain — retired in favor of qeld (D11); reopenable, NXDOMAIN as of 2026-08-10 data-lectures#37 so the Pages CNAME work starts from a clean slate.