🧪 [testing improvement] Test safeGetSession with no session - #90
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Sparkier <5690524+Sparkier@users.noreply.github.com>
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: Added a missing unit test to
src/hooks.server.test.tsto verify the behavior ofsafeGetSessioninside the SvelteKitsupabasemiddleware when no session is present.📊 Coverage: Mocked
$env/static/publicand@supabase/ssrto simulate SupabasegetSessionreturningnull. Asserted thatsafeGetSessioncorrectly falls back to returning{ session: null, user: null }.✨ Result: Improved test coverage and reliability for the SvelteKit application's server hooks and authentication guard rails.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16594490157653392721 started by @Sparkier