Skip to content

🧪 test: improve coverage for safeGetSession in hooks.server.ts - #91

Open
Sparkier wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/hooks-server-test-826373049521642647
Open

🧪 test: improve coverage for safeGetSession in hooks.server.ts#91
Sparkier wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix/hooks-server-test-826373049521642647

Conversation

@Sparkier

@Sparkier Sparkier commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: Added tests for the safeGetSession function within the supabase middleware in src/hooks.server.ts to explicitly handle the edge case where getSession succeeds but getUser fails, indicating an invalid JWT token. To enable this, the supabase handler function was exported for testability.

📊 Coverage:

  • Added test coverage verifying session: null, user: null is returned when getSession finds no session.
  • Added test coverage verifying session: null, user: null is returned when getSession successfully retrieves a session but getUser throws an error (JWT invalidation).
  • Added happy path coverage when both getSession and getUser succeed.

Result: Enhanced test reliability and coverage, ensuring that unauthenticated access scenarios are properly verified and protected against future regressions.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 826373049521642647 started by @Sparkier

Co-authored-by: Sparkier <5690524+Sparkier@users.noreply.github.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
vis-positions Ready Ready Preview Aug 1, 2026 11:27am

@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Co-authored-by: Sparkier <5690524+Sparkier@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant