Skip to content

🔒 fix(security): address timing attack vulnerability in webhook auth - #95

Open
Sparkier wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-timing-attack-webhooks-1574810632966151842
Open

🔒 fix(security): address timing attack vulnerability in webhook auth#95
Sparkier wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-timing-attack-webhooks-1574810632966151842

Conversation

@Sparkier

@Sparkier Sparkier commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What:
Fixed a timing attack vulnerability in webhook authentication endpoints by replacing strict equality checks (!==) with a new utility timingSafeStringEqual leveraging node:crypto.timingSafeEqual.

⚠️ Risk:
If left unfixed, an attacker could potentially brute-force the WEBHOOK_SECRET or DAILY_DIGEST_SECRET_KEY over time by analyzing the microscopic differences in response times when guessing tokens character-by-character.

🛡️ Solution:
Created a utility function in src/lib/server/auth.ts that compares header tokens using crypto.timingSafeEqual, ensuring the comparison takes a constant amount of time regardless of whether or where the mismatch occurs. Implemented length matching checks that safely prevent leakage. Applied this fix across three endpoints:

  • api/webhooks/post/+server.ts
  • api/webhooks/google-sheets/+server.ts
  • api/newsletter/daily-digest/+server.ts
    Also included robust tests for the new utility to ensure correctness.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 1574810632966151842 started by @Sparkier

Replaces simple string comparisons (`!==`) with a `timingSafeStringEqual` utility that leverages `node:crypto`'s `timingSafeEqual`. This utility handles differing lengths without immediately returning, mitigating timing attacks on the `WEBHOOK_SECRET` and `DAILY_DIGEST_SECRET_KEY` tokens. Applies to `api/webhooks/post`, `api/webhooks/google-sheets`, and `api/newsletter/daily-digest`. Tests for the utility have been added.

Co-authored-by: Sparkier <5690524+Sparkier@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
vis-positions Ready Ready Preview Aug 1, 2026 11:31am

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant