Skip to content

feat: align with ecosystem standards v1.7.0 and add drift-check workflow#5

Merged
TMHSDigital merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/v1.7.0-signal-and-drift-check
Apr 25, 2026
Merged

feat: align with ecosystem standards v1.7.0 and add drift-check workflow#5
TMHSDigital merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/v1.7.0-signal-and-drift-check

Conversation

@TMHSDigital
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Phase 2 Session D rollout PR. Follows the validated canary pattern from CFX.

Two changes

  1. Adds .github/workflows/drift-check.yml as a standalone workflow that runs the meta-repo's drift checker (composite action at v1.7) in mode: self against this repo's checkout on every PR and push to main.

  2. Bumps standards-version signals across all SKILL.md, .mdc, AGENTS.md, and CLAUDE.md files from 1.6.3 to 1.7.0. Aligns with the v1.7 standards generation per Phase 2 Decision 1.

The PR's own drift-check run should pass green: signal bump and new check arrive in the same diff, with stale-counts suppressed at the cursor-plugin type level via the meta-repo config.

See TMHSDigital/Developer-Tools-Directory#1 Phase 2 Session D.

Bumps standards-version signals across all skills, rules, and agent
context files from 1.6.3 to 1.7.0 to align with the meta-repo's
v1.7 standards generation.

Adds .github/workflows/drift-check.yml as a standalone workflow that
runs the meta-repo's drift checker against this repo's checkout on
every PR and push to main. Standalone rather than integrated into
existing CI workflows, matching the pattern established in CFX
canary (TMHSDigital/CFX-Developer-Tools#4).

Phase 2 Session D rollout. Parallel batch following the validated
canary pattern.

See TMHSDigital/Developer-Tools-Directory#1 Phase 2 Session D.

Signed-off-by: 154358121+TMHSDigital@users.noreply.github.com
Made-with: Cursor
@TMHSDigital TMHSDigital merged commit 5e7afdb into main Apr 25, 2026
10 checks passed
@TMHSDigital TMHSDigital deleted the feat/v1.7.0-signal-and-drift-check branch April 25, 2026 02:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant