Skip to content

Fix check workflow failure by formatting _layouts/bib.liquid - #1

Merged
Tiny-Snow merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
copilot/fix-check-job-failure
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

Tiny-Snow merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
copilot/fix-check-job-failure

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Sep 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The check GitHub Actions job failed because Prettier detected formatting drift in _layouts/bib.liquid. This PR applies the minimal template formatting update required for the existing Prettier workflow to pass.

  • Root cause

    • npx prettier . --check flagged _layouts/bib.liquid as non-compliant.
  • Change

    • Applied Prettier-consistent formatting to the self-author emphasis block in _layouts/bib.liquid.
    • No template logic, data flow, or rendering behavior was changed.
  • Illustrative diff

    -          <em><strong>
    -            {{- author.first }}
    -            {{ author_last_html -}}
    -          </strong></em>
    +          <em
    +            ><strong>
    +              {{- author.first }}
    +              {{ author_last_html -}}
    +            </strong></em
    +          >

Co-authored-by: Tiny-Snow <74246717+Tiny-Snow@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions job check Fix check workflow failure by formatting _layouts/bib.liquid Sep 4, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from Tiny-Snow September 4, 2026 12:00

@Tiny-Snow Tiny-Snow left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix Prettier formatting in bib layout

@Tiny-Snow
Tiny-Snow marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2026 12:03
@Tiny-Snow
Tiny-Snow merged commit c565de5 into master Sep 4, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants