Skip to content

feat(nano): care / early-delivery / verification guidelines (PR 10) - #889

Merged
agentforce314 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nano-guidelines
Aug 16, 2026
Merged

feat(nano): care / early-delivery / verification guidelines (PR 10)#889
agentforce314 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nano-guidelines

Conversation

@agentforce314

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Three one-line general-practice guidelines restored to the nano prompt, each mapping to an observed TB 2.1 failure class (destructive first probe on db-wal-recovery; wall-clock deaths with no artifact in place; confident-wrong finishes). Distilled from clawcodex's full-prompt sections — no benchmark-specific knowledge. Payload +~120 est. tok (≈2.4K, budget 2.5K). 59 nano tests pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Restores, as one line each, the general practices whose absence the
first TB 2.1 nano run exposed (analysis in my-docs/clawcodex-nano/):

* copy-before-probing for state a task needs intact — db-wal-recovery
  was lost because the first exploratory sqlite3 open of the database
  reset its invalid WAL, destroying what the task asked to recover
* minimal-working-deliverable-early — four tasks died at the per-task
  wall clock mid-polish with no passing artifact in place, on tasks the
  same model solved in pi's run by crossing the line earlier
* verify-requirements-before-finishing — three tasks ended with a
  confident summary the verifier rejected

All three are distillations of clawcodex's full-prompt sections
(Executing actions with care / Doing tasks), not benchmark-specific
knowledge. Fixed payload grows ~120 est. tokens (~2.4K total, budget
2.5K); 59 nano tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant