Skip to content

rpi-eeprom: devtool check-upgrade-status#1603

Open
vermaete wants to merge 1 commit into
agherzan:masterfrom
vermaete:vermaete/upstream_check
Open

rpi-eeprom: devtool check-upgrade-status#1603
vermaete wants to merge 1 commit into
agherzan:masterfrom
vermaete:vermaete/upstream_check

Conversation

@vermaete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

before:
rpi-eeprom v2025.07.17-2712 UNKNOWN_BROKEN None 05d94be4554ce44a057bfce8d0dd37d951703dab
now:
rpi-eeprom 2025.07.17-2712 2026.05.11-2712 None e25fc5dcb8eb072eafb745cd546c3d9f73d102b5

before:
  rpi-eeprom                v2025.07.17-2712 UNKNOWN_BROKEN  None 05d94be4554ce44a057bfce8d0dd37d951703dab
now:
  rpi-eeprom                2025.07.17-2712 2026.05.11-2712 None e25fc5dcb8eb072eafb745cd546c3d9f73d102b5

Signed-off-by: Jan Vermaete <jan.vermaete@gmail.com>
@OldManYellsAtCloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changing PV like this can cause "version goes backwards" problems for those who care about things like that (e.g. when updating package in place). Maybe it could use a PE also?

@vermaete

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PE

or is there a way to keep the 'v' as part of 'PV' with some regex magic?
Well, I could not find an example of it.

@OldManYellsAtCloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Can you not just include the v in the capture also, like ^(?P<pver>v\d{4}\.\d{2}\.\d{2}-\d+)$?

@kraj

kraj commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

PE

or is there a way to keep the 'v' as part of 'PV' with some regex magic? Well, I could not find an example of it.

I think PE bump is the familiar way to do it. Secondly, I wonder if its good idea to break the version bumps while not changing major version. Perhaps wait for next version bump

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants