Use LRS replication for bosh storage account#678
Conversation
LRS (Locally redundant storage) is cheaper than GRS (geo-redundant storage). We observed nearly $500 cost per month for "Geo-Replication v2 Data Transfer". GRS is not necessary for bbl envs used in CF validation (the dominate use case of bbl I would say). Replication type can be overridden if bbl is used for setting up a productive foundation.
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe PR updates the Azure storage account configuration for BOSH by changing the replication strategy from Geo-Redundant Storage (GRS) to Locally Redundant Storage (LRS). This single-line change modifies the 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
LRS (Locally redundant storage) is cheaper than GRS (geo-redundant storage).
We observed nearly $500 cost per month for "Geo-Replication v2 Data Transfer".
GRS is not necessary for bbl envs used in CF validation (the dominate use case of bbl I would say). Replication type can be overridden if bbl is used for setting up a productive foundation.