PR Test - 0603 by heliocodacy · Pull Request #23 · codacy-acme/ktbind

heliocodacy · 2026-03-25T14:19:46Z

No description provided.

add github actions

codacy-production

Pull Request Overview

This PR is not up to standards and contains several critical issues that must prevent merging. Significant security risks have been introduced through the use of eval() and the addition of severely outdated, vulnerable versions of Flask, Django, and Requests.

Furthermore, the logic in python/person.py is fundamentally broken; new methods TowerOfHanoi and fibonacci_of are missing the required self parameter and will fail on recursive calls. This file is particularly high-risk as its complexity has increased while its test coverage has dropped by nearly 27%, leaving the new complex logic entirely unverified. Additionally, the PR lacks a description or linked Jira ticket, and several required functional test scenarios for the new math implementations are missing.

About this PR

There is a systemic pattern of introducing security risks, ranging from insecure function execution (eval) to the use of end-of-life dependencies with critical CVEs.
The PR lacks a description and a linked Jira ticket. Given the nature of the changes (introducing vulnerabilities and broken logic), the intent and context are unclear.

Test suggestions

Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation with valid disk counts
Verify fibonacci_of calculation for base cases and recursive steps
Ensure Person.get_name handles out-of-bounds user_id correctly
Address uncovered logic in complex file python/person.py

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation with valid disk counts
2. Verify fibonacci_of calculation for base cases and recursive steps
3. Ensure Person.get_name handles out-of-bounds user_id correctly
4. Address uncovered logic in complex file python/person.py

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

CVE-2025-64459

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Django 1.11.29 is end-of-life and insecure. Upgrade to at least 4.2.26 to mitigate critical SQL injection risks (CVE-2025-64459) and other high-severity vulnerabilities.

Suggested change

django==1.11.29

django==4.2.26

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

CVE-2023-30861

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

Flask version 1.0.2 is severely outdated and contains known security vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-30861) related to session management. Update to a supported version.

Suggested change

flask==1.0.2

flask==2.2.5

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

    print('User Abbas has been added with id ', person.set_name('Abbas'))
-    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    print('User associated with id 0 is ', person.get_name(0))
+    eval("person.get_name(0)")


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The use of eval() is a significant security risk (code injection). Use safer alternatives like getattr() or call the method directly.

Suggested change

eval("person.get_name(0)")

person.get_name(0)

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

+        TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)


+    def fibonacci_of(n):


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

This method is missing the 'self' parameter. Add 'self' and update recursive calls to 'self.fibonacci_of(n - 1)', or move the function outside the class definition.

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

        else:
            return self.name[user_id]
+
+    def TowerOfHanoi(n , source, destination, auxiliary):


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

This method lacks the required 'self' parameter for an instance method. Additionally, the recursive calls will raise a NameError because the function names are not in the global scope. Either add 'self' and call via 'self.TowerOfHanoi', or use the @staticmethod decorator. This complex logic currently lacks any unit test coverage.

See Complexity in Codacy
See Coverage in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

CVE-2024-47081

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+flask==1.0.2
+django==1.11.29
+requests==2.19.1


_{🟡 MEDIUM RISK}

Upgrade the requests library to version 2.32.4 or higher to prevent sensitive credential leakage in malicious URLs (CVE-2024-47081).

Suggested change

requests==2.19.1

requests==2.32.4

See Issue in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-03-25T14:21:18Z

     */
    @Suppress("unused")
    private val nativePointer: Long = 0
+    private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0


_{⚪ LOW RISK}

Nitpick: The variable name is excessively long (>180 characters) and impairs readability. Standard naming conventions recommend concise, descriptive names.

codacy-production · 2026-05-06T21:09:32Z

Not up to standards ⛔

🔴 Issues 5 critical · 6 high · 4 medium · 1 minor

Alerts:
⚠ 16 issues (≤ 0 issues of at least minor severity)
⚠ 16 issues (≤ 0 issues of at least minor severity)

Results:
16 new issues

Category Results

Security 1 minor
6 high
5 critical
4 medium

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 duplication

Metric Results

Duplication ✅ 0 (≤ 1 duplication)

View in Codacy

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

heliocodacy · 2026-05-19T15:33:23Z

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Co-authored-by: heliocodacy <46491761+heliocodacy@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot · 2026-05-19T15:35:35Z

@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request

Resolved in commit 97d036e. The only conflict was in python/requirements.txt (an add/add conflict where both sides had identical content — requests==2.19.1). The branch is now up to date with master.

codacy-production

Pull Request Overview

This PR is currently below project standards. It introduces significant logic and security flaws in 'python/person.py', including non-functional recursive methods and the use of the dangerous 'eval()' function.

Additionally, the PR significantly reduces test coverage by deleting existing tests without replacement, while simultaneously adding complex new logic. Critical security vulnerabilities were also detected in the project dependencies (PyYAML). This PR should not be merged in its current state due to high-risk logic errors and security concerns.

About this PR

The PR includes changes to 'kotlin/bin/test'. Binary and build directories are typically ignored by version control to avoid bloat and conflicts.
This PR lacks a description and includes logically unrelated changes (e.g., recursive algorithms added to a 'Person' class alongside Kotlin test modifications). Please provide context and consider splitting unrelated changes into separate PRs.

Test suggestions

Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation correctly calculates and prints moves
Verify fibonacci_of implementation returns correct values for base and recursive cases
Verify Person class still functions correctly after removal of test_person2
Restore unit test coverage for 'python/person.py' to meet the 70% threshold

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify TowerOfHanoi implementation correctly calculates and prints moves
2. Verify fibonacci_of implementation returns correct values for base and recursive cases
3. Restore unit test coverage for 'python/person.py' to meet the 70% threshold

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions}
_{TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}

codacy-production · 2026-06-08T16:10:35Z

CVE-2020-14343

 django==1.11.29
-requests==2.19.1
+requests==2.19.1
+PyYAML==5.3


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

PyYAML 5.3 is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution (CVE-2020-14343). Update to version 5.4.1 or higher to mitigate this risk.

Suggested change

PyYAML==5.3

PyYAML==5.4.1

codacy-production · 2026-06-08T16:10:36Z

+    eval("person.get_name(0)")
+    eval("fibonacci_of(3)")


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

The use of 'eval()' is a critical security risk as it allows execution of arbitrary code. It is unnecessary here; replace 'eval()' with direct method calls.

Suggested change

eval("person.get_name(0)")

eval("fibonacci_of(3)")

person.get_name(0)

person.fibonacci_of(3)

codacy-production · 2026-06-08T16:10:36Z

+    def TowerOfHanoi(n , source, destination, auxiliary):
+        if n==1:
+            print ("Move disk 1 from source",source,"to destination",destination)
+            return
+        TowerOfHanoi(n-1, source, auxiliary, destination)
+        print ("Move disk",n,"from source",source,"to destination",destination)
+        TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)


+    def fibonacci_of(n):
+        if n in {0, 1}:  # Base case
+            return n
+        return fibonacci_of(n - 1) + fibonacci_of(n - 2)  # Recursive case


_{🔴 HIGH RISK}

These methods are non-functional. They are missing the 'self' parameter required for instance methods in the 'Person' class. Additionally, the recursive calls will fail with a NameError because they are not correctly scoped to the class or instance. If these are intended as utility functions, move them outside the class or declare them as @staticmethod.

@staticmethod def TowerOfHanoi(n, from_rod, to_rod, aux_rod): if n == 1: print("Move disk 1 from rod", from_rod, "to rod", to_rod) return Person.TowerOfHanoi(n - 1, from_rod, aux_rod, to_rod) # ... remaining logic

codacy-production · 2026-06-08T16:10:36Z

@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@ def test_person(self):
        person.set_name('yay')
        self.assertEqual(person.get_name(0), 'yay')



_{🟡 MEDIUM RISK}

Deleting existing tests has contributed to a 22.5% reduction in project coverage. This is particularly risky as new complex logic was added to 'python/person.py' without accompanying unit tests. Please restore 'test_person2' or provide equivalent coverage for the new features.

See Coverage in Codacy

codacy-production · 2026-06-08T16:10:36Z

     */
    @Suppress("unused")
    private val nativePointer: Long = 0
+    private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0


_{⚪ LOW RISK}

Nitpick: The variable name is excessively long (over 200 characters) and impairs code maintainability. Use a more concise, descriptive name.

Suggested change

private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0

private val testVariable: Long = 0

hjrocha and others added 5 commits September 7, 2023 12:21

some code

e22b293

Merge branch 'master' into feature-branch-02

a8a8233

add github actions

Create .codacy.yaml

d8cd50d

add requirements.txt and a bit more code

fca3efb

lib removal

cb71288

codacy-production Bot reviewed Mar 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of heliocodacy May 19, 2026 15:33 View session

Merge origin/master into feature-branch-02 and resolve conflicts

97d036e

Co-authored-by: heliocodacy <46491761+heliocodacy@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot finished work on behalf of heliocodacy May 19, 2026 15:35

add some more libs

a980036

codacy-production Bot reviewed Jun 8, 2026

View reviewed changes

		TowerOfHanoi(n-1, auxiliary, destination, source)


		def fibonacci_of(n):

		eval("person.get_name(0)")
		eval("fibonacci_of(3)") No newline at end of file

		@@ -17,10 +17,6 @@ def test_person(self):
		person.set_name('yay')
		self.assertEqual(person.get_name(0), 'yay')

	private val testvar123455VariableMVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLengthVariableMaxLength: Long = 0
	private val testVariable: Long = 0

Uh oh!

Conversation

heliocodacy commented Mar 25, 2026

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

About this PR

Test suggestions

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Mar 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot commented May 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Not up to standards ⛔

Uh oh!

heliocodacy commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented May 19, 2026

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

About this PR

Test suggestions

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Jun 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Jun 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Jun 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Jun 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codacy-production Bot Jun 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

codacy-production Bot commented May 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading