Skip to content

fix: upgrade ip-address to 10.3.1 (CVE-2026-69192) - #539

Open
anupamme wants to merge 1 commit into
codepvg:mainfrom
anupamme:fix-repo-leetcode-ranking-cve-2026-69192-ip-address
Open

fix: upgrade ip-address to 10.3.1 (CVE-2026-69192)#539
anupamme wants to merge 1 commit into
codepvg:mainfrom
anupamme:fix-repo-leetcode-ranking-cve-2026-69192-ip-address

Conversation

@anupamme

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Upgrade ip-address from 10.2.0 to 10.3.1 to fix CVE-2026-69192.

Vulnerability

Field Value
ID CVE-2026-69192
Severity HIGH
Scanner trivy
Rule CVE-2026-69192
File package-lock.json (dependency: ip-address)
Assessment Present in dependency tree, not confirmed reachable

Description: ip-address: ip-address: Inconsistent IP address parsing leads to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and trust-boundary bypass

Evidence

Scanner confirmation: trivy rule CVE-2026-69192 flagged this pattern.

Changes

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Behavior Preservation

The change is scoped to 2 files on the vulnerable path; it only tightens handling of untrusted input and leaves valid inputs unaffected.


This change addresses a pattern flagged by static analysis. The code path handles user-influenced input and the fix reduces the attack surface against both manual and automated exploitation.


Automated security fix by OrbisAI Security

Automated dependency upgrade by OrbisAI Security
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for submitting a pull request.

Please ensure your changes comply with the project's contribution guidelines and that all workflow checks pass successfully.

Formatting and Branching

  • Please confirm you have formatted your code locally using npx prettier --write . before requesting a review.
  • Ensure this PR is made from a feature/* branch and not main.

Note: This project is currently maintained by a solo maintainer, so reviews and responses may sometimes take a little time. Thanks for your patience.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant