License the repository under MIT

[TheGreatAxios]

Summary

• Add a root MIT LICENSE (Copyright 2026 ABK Labs, Inc.)
• Remove per-starter license fields from all starter/*/package.json files
• Update the root README so new examples inherit the repo license instead of setting their own

Test plan

• Confirm GitHub shows the repo as MIT
• Spot-check that no starter package.json still declares license

[TheGreatAxios]

code-review

Adds a root MIT LICENSE (ABK Labs, Inc.) and removes per-starter license fields so the repo license is the single source of truth. README guidance matches.

Checks

• git log origin/main..HEAD: one commit, subject/body ≤72
• git diff origin/main...HEAD --stat: LICENSE + README + nine starter package.json only; no binaries
• Diff is mechanical license-field deletion; MIT text is the standard form

Looks good to merge. (GitHub blocks self-approve on this PR.)

[pvams]

@alexanderguy - @alex how do y'all feel about this?

[alexanderguy]

@alexanderguy - @alex how do y'all feel about this?

For code people are possibly integrating into their own projects, I think MIT is fine.