Skip to content

webhooks working#6

Open
lmunro wants to merge 2 commits into
dcm-ops:masterfrom
rackspace-cookbooks:add-webhook-support
Open

webhooks working#6
lmunro wants to merge 2 commits into
dcm-ops:masterfrom
rackspace-cookbooks:add-webhook-support

Conversation

@lmunro

@lmunro lmunro commented Dec 11, 2014

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@lmunro lmunro closed this Dec 11, 2014
@lmunro lmunro reopened this Dec 11, 2014
@jujugrrr

jujugrrr commented Feb 4, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi, it's nice, any news on this one?

@goacid

goacid commented Feb 26, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Really usefull, it must be merged !

@martinb3

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👍 /poke @lusis @danryan

martinb3 referenced this pull request in rackspace-cookbooks/platformstack Mar 24, 2015
@BarthV

BarthV commented Apr 24, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🆙

@BarthV

BarthV commented May 16, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @lmunro & @martinb3 !

Did you really put your PR branch on Chef supermarket ? I'm not sure spillting this project was the best idea here :-/

Did @dcm-ops abandoned this cookbook or he let it die ? If this repo is not moving anymore maybe we can ask one of the Chef's maintainers community (@redguide or @chef-brigade) to remedy the problem, take over the project and to mediate with the maintainer.

What do you think about that ?

@lusis & @danryan : Would you agree to join @redguide organization and delegate your cookbook on it (we did a great merging job on nodejs in the past)?
This would allow the code to move faster & This would also ensure stability in the governance of the cookbook. In this case we'll need to ask @lmunro to share and release his ownership over supermarket namespace.

@martinb3

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @BarthV, we have since last year for a response from the original maintainers. As far as we can tell, it's died. We are happy to maintain the cookbook and accept PRs and publish new versions, so I think we'd rather our version become the official one, and we're happy to maintain it as such.

Please see my comments in #5 for more context.

@BarthV BarthV mentioned this pull request May 19, 2015
@BarthV

BarthV commented May 19, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#9 : pending

@BarthV

BarthV commented May 21, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Still zero life sign from maintainers ... Trying Twitter (they looks active on it)
https://twitter.com/bvessemont/status/601385262065852416

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants