Skip to content

Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.18#8844

Open
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/turbo-monorepo
Open

Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.18#8844
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
deps/tool/turbo-monorepo

Conversation

@hash-worker

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ℹ️ Note

This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
npm:turbo (source) 2.6.3 → 2.9.18 age confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

vercel/turborepo (npm:turbo)

v2.9.18: Turborepo v2.9.18

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.17...v2.9.18

v2.9.17: Turborepo v2.9.17

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.16...v2.9.17

v2.9.16: Turborepo v2.9.16

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.15...v2.9.16

v2.9.15: Turborepo v2.9.15

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.14...v2.9.15

v2.9.14: Turborepo v2.9.14

Compare Source

[!NOTE]
This release contains important security fixes.

High:
Low:

What's Changed

Changelog

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.12...v2.9.14

v2.9.12: Turborepo v2.9.12

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.11...v2.9.12

v2.9.11: Turborepo v2.9.11

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.10...v2.9.11

v2.9.10: Turborepo v2.9.10

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Full Changelog: vercel/turborepo@v2.9.9...v2.9.10

v2.9.9: Turborepo v2.9.9

Compare Source

What's Changed

Changelog

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"
  • Automerge
    • "before 4am every weekday,every weekend"

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot enabled auto-merge June 9, 2026 01:11
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 24, 2026 11:49pm
hashdotdesign-tokens Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 24, 2026 11:49pm
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 24, 2026 11:49pm

@cursor

cursor Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single dev-tool version bump with no application or CI config changes in the diff; main risk is upstream Turbo behavior differences when running monorepo tasks.

Overview
Bumps the mise-managed Turborepo CLI (npm:turbo) in .config/mise/config.toml from 2.6.3 to 2.9.18, so local and mise-driven workflows (e.g. turbo run via mise tasks) use the newer release.

No other files or repo config change in this diff—only the tool version pin.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7014af4. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Jun 9, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.61%. Comparing base (fd129ea) to head (7014af4).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8844   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.61%   59.61%           
=======================================
  Files        1348     1348           
  Lines      131877   131877           
  Branches     5944     5944           
=======================================
  Hits        78615    78615           
  Misses      52357    52357           
  Partials      905      905
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks 0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 2.82% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec 84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net 96.21% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower 67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol 92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec 72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api 2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization 62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store 29.02% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store 37.99% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning 47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types 0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation 83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast 87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest 28.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core 79.60% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics 72.31% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval 75.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir 89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir 88.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr 94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Jun 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 15.38%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 78 untouched benchmarks

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[64] 140.8 ns 170 ns -17.16%
❌ bit_matrix/dense/iter_row[200] 185.8 ns 215 ns -13.57%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

Comparing deps/tool/turbo-monorepo (7014af4) with main (3dbbe7b)1

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (0eea201) during the generation of this report, so 3dbbe7b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from 59c8ccf to 5238eba Compare June 9, 2026 23:06
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.14 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.15 Jun 9, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from 5238eba to d6ae07e Compare June 11, 2026 15:55
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.15 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.16 Jun 11, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from d6ae07e to 445238f Compare June 23, 2026 17:02
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.16 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.17 Jun 23, 2026
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot force-pushed the deps/tool/turbo-monorepo branch from 445238f to 7014af4 Compare June 24, 2026 23:36
@hash-worker hash-worker Bot changed the title Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.17 Update tool npm:turbo to v2.9.18 Jun 24, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 255 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 109 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$44.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.367 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.594 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.203 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.294 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$3.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.441 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.798 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.211 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.957 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$43.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.808 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.50 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}34.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$50.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 253 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.139 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$94.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 512 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$33.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.415 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.30 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.950 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.788 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.462 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.588 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.476 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.988 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$62.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.695 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 615 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$68.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$78.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 475 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$86.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.102 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 519 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.816 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$46.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$52.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$62.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$63.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$64.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.932 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 690 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$548 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.40 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}5.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

@indietyp indietyp

@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@indietyp @TimDiekmann