FE-817: Add supply chain site + product dashboard, Rudderstack telemetry handling

[CiaranMn]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

1. Adds a /supply-chain dashboard with a site-level and product-level view, including analysis on step and end-to-end pipeline, inventory dwell cost, and planning parameter calibration.
2. Implement Rudderstack telemetry tracking

🚫 Blocked by

• Based on BE-610: Add migration for generic supply chain ontology #8872, needs that merging into main first
• AI reviews

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Tests added as part of this PR.

❓ How to test this?

1. TODO

📹 Demo

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 29, 2026 8:02pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jun 29, 2026 8:02pm
petrinaut	Skipped		Jun 29, 2026 8:02pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

High Risk
New authenticated analysis gateway issues presigned storage URLs with tenant isolation logic—bugs could leak artifacts across webs. Telemetry and env classification (ENVIRONMENT vs NODE_ENV) affect production analytics and migration behavior.

Overview
Adds a supply-chain analysis platform on the API: authenticated POST /api/analysis batches named invocations (products, sites, graphs, steps, supplier performance) into web-scoped JSON artifacts in object storage, returns presigned URLs (with slug validation and cross-web key guards), and records analysis_run telemetry. Dev/test get vendored demo data seeded into example-org, a CLI importer, and ontology types for opportunity status updates and supply-chain user preferences.

Product analytics moves from Snowplow to Rudderstack (HASH_API_RUDDERSTACK_KEY, optional ENVIRONMENT labels, POST /api/telemetry for allowlisted frontend events, registration identify/track on the Kratos webhook). Docs and .env drop Snowplow vars; @snowplow/node-tracker is removed.

Smaller API tweaks: higher GraphQL rate limits, isStagingEnv / stricter isDevEnv, dev-only .dev.migration.ts gating, staging email subject prefix, aviation link titles renamed (Takes Off From / Lands At), and a Cursor rule for meaningful TypeScript identifiers.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit fbdc689. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.41706% with 243 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 59.61%. Comparing base (93903d1) to head (c3b6529).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...h-api/src/seed-data/import-supply-chain-dataset.ts	0.00%	77 Missing ⚠️
...s/hash-api/src/seed-data/seed-supply-chain-demo.ts	0.00%	37 Missing ⚠️
...ps/hash-api/src/analysis/setup-analysis-handler.ts	0.00%	33 Missing ⚠️
...h-api/src/seed-data/supply-chain-dataset-import.ts	71.59%	14 Missing and 11 partials ⚠️
...nalysis/setup-analysis-handler/resolve-analysis.ts	70.96%	9 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
...pps/hash-api/src/analysis/analyses/supply-chain.ts	54.83%	12 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...pply-chain-view-feedback-and-settings.migration.ts	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
...-api/src/analysis/analyses/supply-chain/dataset.ts	69.56%	4 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
apps/hash-api/src/auth/create-auth-handlers.ts	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
apps/hash-api/src/analysis/shared/errors.ts	66.66%	3 Missing ⚠️
... and 6 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8908      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.76%   59.61%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files        1348     1365      +17     
  Lines      131800   132686     +886     
  Branches     5943     6048     +105     
==========================================
+ Hits        78772    79098     +326     
- Misses      52120    52654     +534     
- Partials      908      934      +26     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-api	6.40% <42.41%> (+3.14%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request because it exceeds the maximum number of files (300). Try reducing the number of changed files and requesting a review from Copilot again.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing cm/add-supply-chain-dashboard (fbdc689) with main (b8f5e58)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (e04b538) during the generation of this report, so b8f5e58 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request because it exceeds the maximum number of files (300). Try reducing the number of changed files and requesting a review from Copilot again.

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c3b6529. Configure here.}

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request because it exceeds the maximum number of files (300). Try reducing the number of changed files and requesting a review from Copilot again.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 219 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.182 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$23.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.963 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.906 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.353 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$3.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.240 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.264 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.609 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.420 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$49.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.342 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$267 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.02 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.024 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$10.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$10.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.700 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.402 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.602 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$62.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 943 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$67.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$76.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$86.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$92.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$73.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$50.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.821 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.964 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 458 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$531 \mathrm{ms} \pm 807 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph