SecurePDF takes security seriously. This document outlines our security practices and how to report vulnerabilities.
| Version | Supported |
|---|---|
| 1.0.x | β Fully supported |
| < 1.0 | β Not supported |
SecurePDF implements state-of-the-art cryptography:
- Encryption: AES-256-GCM (authenticated encryption)
- Key Derivation: PBKDF2 with minimum 100,000 iterations
- Digital Signatures: RSA-PSS with SHA-3-256
- Random Generation: Cryptographically secure random (CSPRNG)
Unlike traditional PDF:
- No JavaScript execution
- No PostScript interpretation
- No embedded executables
- Pure JSON data format
All inputs are strictly validated:
- JSON Schema validation for document structure
- Content sanitization for all text fields
- File size limits to prevent DoS attacks
- MIME type verification for uploads
π CRITICAL: Do NOT report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues!
Send security reports to: security@secure-pdf.org
Include in your report:
- Description of the vulnerability
- Steps to reproduce the issue
- Proof of concept (if applicable)
- SPDF document demonstrating the issue (if safe)
- Your contact information
- Acknowledgment: Within 24 hours
- Initial Assessment: Within 72 hours
- Status Updates: Weekly until resolved
- Resolution: Target within 30 days for critical issues
- Day 0: Vulnerability reported
- Day 1-3: Initial assessment and acknowledgment
- Day 7-30: Fix development and testing
- Day 30+: Public disclosure after fix deployment
- Encryption at Rest: All sensitive content encrypted
- Digital Signatures: Cryptographic proof of authenticity
- Audit Trail: Immutable record of all changes
- Permission Controls: Granular access restrictions
- Memory Safety: TypeScript prevents many common vulnerabilities
- Input Sanitization: All external data validated
- Error Handling: No information leakage in error messages
- Secure Defaults: Conservative security settings by default
- Dependency Scanning: Regular security audits of dependencies
- Code Reviews: All security-critical code peer-reviewed
- Automated Testing: Security tests in CI/CD pipeline
- Static Analysis: SAST tools integrated in development
- Certificate Validation: Demo uses self-signed certificates
- Key Storage: Production needs proper HSM integration
- Network Transport: HTTPS required for sensitive documents
- Browser Sandbox: Viewer inherits browser security model
- Use trusted Certificate Authorities in production
- Implement proper key management systems
- Always use TLS 1.3+ for document transmission
- Keep browsers updated for latest security patches
// β
Good: Validate all inputs
const validator = new SpdfValidator();
if (!validator.validate(document)) {
throw new SecurityError('Invalid document structure');
}
// β Bad: Trust user input
const content = document.content; // No validation- Strong Passwords: Use complex passwords for encrypted documents
- Verify Signatures: Always check digital signatures before trusting
- Update Software: Keep SecurePDF tools updated
- Secure Storage: Store private keys securely
- Network Security: Use HTTPS/TLS for all communications
- Access Controls: Implement proper authentication/authorization
- Monitoring: Log and monitor document access patterns
- Backup Security: Encrypt backups and test recovery procedures
- Hardware Security Module (HSM) support
- Multi-signature workflows
- Enhanced audit logging
- Certificate Authority integration
- Zero-knowledge proofs for privacy
- Quantum-resistant algorithms preparation
- Advanced threat detection
- Automated security scanning
We're planning to launch a bug bounty program. Details coming soon!
Scope: Core cryptographic implementations, parser vulnerabilities, authentication bypasses
Rewards: To be determined based on severity
We thank the security community for helping make SecurePDF more secure:
- OWASP Secure Coding Practices
- NIST Cryptographic Standards
- Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE)
Remember: Security is everyone's responsibility. When in doubt, ask!