[PB-6681] move getUser to encryptedStorage - #2086
Open
TamaraFinogina wants to merge 5 commits into
Open
Conversation
Deploying drive-web with
|
| Latest commit: |
6012dc4
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://94e6f16b.drive-web.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://move-getuser-to-encrytedstor.drive-web.pages.dev |
TamaraFinogina
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 31, 2026 14:14
TamaraFinogina
requested review from
a team,
CandelR and
larryrider
as code owners
July 31, 2026 14:14
…internxt/drive-web into move_getUser_to_encrytedStorage
|
7 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
PR switching to encrypted UserSettings was too huge.
I'm splitting it into several parts. This PR moves the getUser/setUser functions to the module where they should be.
Related Issues
Relates to PB-6681
Checklist
Testing Process
Unit tests
Additional Notes
Should be exactly as before, with a few explicit error handlings instead of type casting