Skip to content

[discussion-215] New SNIFFER_PROBES IDS - #239

Merged
olivhoenen merged 16 commits into
iterorganization:feature/sniffer_probe_idsfrom
imbeauf:extension/discussion-215
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

[discussion-215] New SNIFFER_PROBES IDS#239
olivhoenen merged 16 commits into
iterorganization:feature/sniffer_probe_idsfrom
imbeauf:extension/discussion-215

Conversation

@imbeauf

@imbeauf imbeauf commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Static description only so far


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://imas-data-dictionary--239.org.readthedocs.build/en/239/

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DavidPCoster DavidPCoster left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve the skeleton -- it would be good to see some flesh, though ...

@imbeauf

imbeauf commented May 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

We are still missing many reviews on this PR, please ...

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@olivhoenen olivhoenen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve the skeleton -- it would be good to see some flesh, though ...

I agree with @DavidPCoster here, the current stab for this new IDS seems not ready for addition in the develop branch. History of DD have shown that releasing IDS in too early draft version can be an annoyance for users (as for maintainers) on the long term.

If the idea is to have a draft structure for further testing and refining of the IDS, we can redirect it into a feature branch with to-be-tested label.

</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element ref="code"/>
<xs:element ref="time"/>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In its current version the IDS is fully static, so it should not even have a time node (or dynamic signals shall be defined and added, which may help shape the structure)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed, so since the dynamic part isn't specified yet I have removed the time node.

Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@SimonPinches SimonPinches left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think these probes are exclusively used to detect the power density of stray EC radiation so we should make this clearer in the naming of the IDS. My proposal is therefore to rename to ec_sniffer_probes. I assume we go with the plural form since in general machines have multiple probes and not just one.

Comment thread html_documentation/dd_versions.html Outdated
Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/sniffer_probes/dd_sniffer_probes.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/ec_sniffer_probes/dd_ec_sniffer_probes.xsd
Comment thread dd_data_dictionary.xml.xsd Outdated
Comment thread dd_data_dictionary.xml.xsd Outdated
Comment thread schemas/ec_sniffer_probes/dd_ec_sniffer_probes.xsd
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

imbeauf and others added 2 commits July 2, 2026 13:26
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

imbeauf and others added 3 commits July 2, 2026 13:29
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Pinches <SimonPinches@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@olivhoenen
olivhoenen changed the base branch from develop to feature/sniffer_probe_ids July 3, 2026 13:19
@olivhoenen olivhoenen added the to be tested A PR that needs to be tested in-situ before merging to a production branch label Jul 3, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@olivhoenen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Redirected this draft to a feature branch so requesters can test and update the description before a release

@olivhoenen
olivhoenen merged commit c871070 into iterorganization:feature/sniffer_probe_ids Aug 6, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

to be tested A PR that needs to be tested in-situ before merging to a production branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants