docs: RFC to Allow blocking NodePool disruption and consolidation via external health signals#2867
docs: RFC to Allow blocking NodePool disruption and consolidation via external health signals#2867vaietc wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Conversation
…reaking drift proposal
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vaietc The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Welcome @vaietc! |
|
Hi @vaietc. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Thanks for cutting the RFC! I will try to read through this |
|
Apologies, I had to clone this through a common fork my organization has created. New verison is here: #2901 |
Fixes #2497
Description
This adds a few proposed paths to control disruption and consolidation actions via external health signals. Currently, this change only includes an initial RFC and does not dive into implementation details yet. As the feedback progresses, I will add more information on specific changes within the code base.
How was this change tested?
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.