Skip to content

fix: openAI provider alignement - #2240

Open
Wallgau wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
misalignment-open-ai-provider
Open

fix: openAI provider alignement#2240
Wallgau wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
misalignment-open-ai-provider

Conversation

@Wallgau

@Wallgau Wallgau commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

fix misalignment for openAI
BEFORE
Screenshot 2026-08-13 at 9 05 31 AM

AFTER
Screenshot 2026-08-13 at 10 28 30 AM

Screenshot 2026-08-13 at 10 27 39 AM

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Updated dialog footers to support layouts with up to three actions.
    • Improved positioning for tertiary, secondary, and primary actions.
    • Enhanced tooltip coverage and consistent button styling, including visible focus states.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added frontend 🟨 Issues related to the UI/UX bug 🔴 Something isn't working. labels Aug 13, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 24fbcd86-38a3-4089-94d3-0e1223ddd837

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e4f586 and cf8df80.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/globals.css
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/app/globals.css

Walkthrough

IBM dialog footer styles now support three actions with explicit grid placement. Tooltip wrappers fill tertiary-action cells. Shared button sizing, tertiary spacing, and focus-visible selectors also support buttons nested inside spans.

Changes

IBM dialog footer styling

Layer / File(s) Summary
Footer layout and button states
frontend/app/globals.css
Three-action footers use a four-column grid with separate tertiary, secondary, and primary action placement. Tertiary tooltip wrappers fill their cells. Button sizing, tertiary spacing, and focus-visible selectors include span-wrapped buttons.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Mergeability Score: ⚪ Minimal · up to cf8df

This is a localized frontend styling change for OpenAI provider alignment, with no actionable merge-blocking risk remaining beyond normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: fixing alignment in the OpenAI provider setup interface.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch misalignment-open-ai-provider

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug 🔴 Something isn't working. and removed bug 🔴 Something isn't working. labels Aug 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug 🔴 Something isn't working. and removed bug 🔴 Something isn't working. labels Aug 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the lgtm label Aug 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug 🔴 Something isn't working. and removed bug 🔴 Something isn't working. labels Aug 14, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug 🔴 Something isn't working. frontend 🟨 Issues related to the UI/UX lgtm

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants