Preserve concrete live RCB names without duplicate 01 suffix#44
Merged
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Field defect
The live model already exposes the concrete MMS RCB object
A_BRCB_1201. The generated SCL omittedReportControl@indexed, whose SCL default is true, while also emittingRptEnabled max=1. A legacy importer therefore instantiated the already-concrete name again and addressed the non-existentA_BRCB_120101.Standard-aligned correction
indexed="false"RptEnabled max="1"ClientLNindex assignments from concrete live instancesConfReportControl maxwith the number of exported concrete RCBsRegression
The BCU7SL case now verifies that
A_BRCB_1201remains exactlyA_BRCB_1201and thatA_BRCB_120101cannot be produced.