Description of the new feature / enhancement
Allow a ProcessContainer policy to grant device-class capabilities, and emit them verbatim instead of hashing them. For example:
Ideally:
- Named aliases for the common sensitive devices (
webcam, microphone, location), mapped to both the name-derived SID and the device-class SID, matching what <DeviceCapability> produces for packaged apps.
- Fail closed if a tier can't apply a requested device capability, in line with "never silently omit a requested restriction". The same applies in reverse: never silently drop a requested grant without an error.
- The tier's actual behaviour documented, including whether Windows camera and microphone privacy settings are still honoured for an unpackaged container.
Proposed technical implementation details
No response
Description of the new feature / enhancement
Allow a ProcessContainer policy to grant device-class capabilities, and emit them verbatim instead of hashing them. For example:
Ideally:
webcam,microphone,location), mapped to both the name-derived SID and the device-class SID, matching what<DeviceCapability>produces for packaged apps.Proposed technical implementation details
No response