Bulk: add 175 IRC networks from netsplit.de directory#20
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 34 minutes and 21 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Server list probeScope: 175 server(s) changed vs
Failed — unreachable on every transport
Degraded — one transport unreachable
|
Replaces #18 (merged then reverted via
e6285f2once it became clearprobe.py --applyis non-pruning by design).Summary
Bulk import from a fresh scrape of netsplit.de's network catalog (2026-06-07).
wssis a best-guesswss://<host>:443/. netsplit.de doesn't track WebSocket gateways, and the crawl probe won't drop entries that don't answer — so the entries that turn out to have no working WSS gateway will sit inservers.jsonuntil pruned manually (or until a--pruneflag is added).descriptionis the netsplit-reported avg users/channels for context; happy to swap for a real tagline.obsidian: falseeverywhere.Filters applied
ircscan't be formedTest plan
validate-pr.yml)