OCPBUGS-97918: Upgrades envtest Makefile target

[raphaelvrosa]

• Sets it to use go install with 0.20.0 envtest version.
• Updates test Makefile targets to reflect changes in envtest
• Other changes come from make test call that automates the updates of base CRD yamls.
• Updates failed test case: changed from TCP to UDP protocol, as it appears the test was not being executed properly.
• Old kubebuilder envtest was deprecated - 🚨 Action Required: Ensure that you no longer use https://storage.googleapis.com/kubebuilder-tools kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#4082
• Unblocks: OCPBUGS-78374: Updating ingress-node-firewall-daemon-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.20 #703

- What this PR does and why is it needed

- Special notes for reviewers

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 0cecddd4-5a7d-4db2-8d2a-d38df719f4f7

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[raphaelvrosa]

@danwinship please take a look, backports #715

[openshift-ci]

@raphaelvrosa: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[danwinship]

/lgtm
/approved
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci]

@danwinship: The label(s) backport-risk-assessed cannot be applied or removed, because you are not in one of the allowed teams and are not an allowed user. Must be a member of one of these teams: openshift-patch-managers, openshift-release-oversight, openshift-staff-engineers, openshift-sustaining-engineers

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/approved
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

• Sets it to use go install with 0.20.0 envtest version.
• Updates test Makefile targets to reflect changes in envtest
• Other changes come from make test call that automates the updates of base CRD yamls.
• Updates failed test case: changed from TCP to UDP protocol, as it appears the test was not being executed properly.
• Old kubebuilder envtest was deprecated - 🚨 Action Required: Ensure that you no longer use https://storage.googleapis.com/kubebuilder-tools kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#4082
• Unblocks: OCPBUGS-78374: Updating ingress-node-firewall-daemon-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.20 #703

- What this PR does and why is it needed

- Special notes for reviewers

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[raphaelvrosa]

/jira refresh
/verified by @raphaelvrosa with backporting process
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/verified by @raphaelvrosa with backporting process
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This PR has been marked as verified by @raphaelvrosa with backporting process.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/verified by @raphaelvrosa with backporting process
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@raphaelvrosa: The label(s) backport-risk-assessed cannot be applied or removed, because you are not in one of the allowed teams and are not an allowed user. Must be a member of one of these teams: openshift-patch-managers, openshift-release-oversight, openshift-staff-engineers, openshift-sustaining-engineers

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
/verified by @raphaelvrosa with backporting process
/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86869 to target a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86869 to target a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is invalid:

• expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86869 to target a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[raphaelvrosa]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note text is set and does not match the template
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86869 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-86869 targets the "4.21.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0, 4.21.z
• bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (core-networking-bot@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[raphaelvrosa]

@danwinship can you approve it? /approve

[danwinship]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, raphaelvrosa

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [danwinship]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@raphaelvrosa: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/ingress-node-firewall#728

All linked pull requests have the verified tag. Jira Issue OCPBUGS-97918 has been moved to the VERIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

• Sets it to use go install with 0.20.0 envtest version.
• Updates test Makefile targets to reflect changes in envtest
• Other changes come from make test call that automates the updates of base CRD yamls.
• Updates failed test case: changed from TCP to UDP protocol, as it appears the test was not being executed properly.
• Old kubebuilder envtest was deprecated - 🚨 Action Required: Ensure that you no longer use https://storage.googleapis.com/kubebuilder-tools kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder#4082
• Unblocks: OCPBUGS-78374: Updating ingress-node-firewall-daemon-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.20 #703

- What this PR does and why is it needed

- Special notes for reviewers

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.