Map reasoning effort onto reasoning_effort for the gpt-oss models - #4
Merged
Conversation
Only that family takes the parameter. The rest of Groq's catalogue is third-party and controls reasoning differently or not at all, so the option is left off there rather than guessed at.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only that family takes the parameter. The rest of Groq's catalogue is
third-party and controls reasoning differently or not at all, so the option is
left off there rather than guessed at.
Closes the gap left in v0.15.0, where this provider accepted the neutral
effortoption and ignored it.composer cigreen locally.