docs(safety): SR-41 for async cross-encoding transcoding; de-stale LS-F-27 (#272)#287
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…-F-27 (#272) Closes the #272 campaign's traceability gap. The async cross-encoding string transcoding capability (PRs #273–#285, 44 async_cross_encoding tests) shipped without a requirement: SR-17 ("correct string transcoding", verified) links only the SYNC adapter_safety tests, and LS-F-27's text still said async transcoding was "a larger tracked capability (#272); until it lands, fail loud" — but #272 is done. - Adds SR-41 "Async cross-encoding string transcoding" (verified): all 6 directions × {param, result} × {flat, one-level-nested}, both async variants; nested list<u8> deep-copied verbatim; #281 closed. derives-from SR-17, mitigates LS-F-27, tracked-by #272. Honest verification posture recorded: transcode loops runtime-verified under wasmtime; the async-lift integration via the real-adapter *_within_budget tests (full e2e kiln-gated); each increment adversarially Mythos-passed (4 silent-corruption bugs caught before merge). - SR-41 traceability entry links a representative set of the async_cross_encoding + integration local-bounds + LS-F-27 gate tests (all verified to exist; rivet 0 broken cross-refs). - De-stales LS-F-27: the guard is now the RESIDUAL fallback for the only remaining unsupported shape (deeper list nesting, list<list<string>>, #286), with the allow-set narrowed in lockstep to ≡ the emitter's transcode-set. Doc-only (no code). YAML valid; LS-N gate 57/0/0 (LS-F-27 8 pass); rivet 0 broken cross-refs (the +2 errors are the pre-existing every-SR-lacks-design-decision/feature backlog, not new-class). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
LS-N verification gate✅ 57/57 approved LS entries verified
Approved Failed LS entries(none) Missing regression tests(none) Updated automatically by |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Closes the #272 campaign's traceability gap (doc-only — no code).
The async cross-encoding string transcoding capability (PRs #273–#285, 44
async_cross_encodingtests) shipped without a requirement covering it: SR-17 links only the syncadapter_safetytests, and LS-F-27's text still said async transcoding was "a larger tracked capability (#272); until it lands, fail loud" — but #272 is done.Changes
list<u8>deep-copied verbatim; candidate: async adapter may not deep-copy nested string/list pointers in list<string> params (pre-existing, reachability unconfirmed) #281 closed.derives-from SR-17,mitigates LS-F-27,tracked-by #272. Honest verification posture recorded (transcode loops runtime-verified under wasmtime; async-lift integration via the real-adapter*_within_budgettests; full e2e kiln-gated; each increment adversarially Mythos-passed — 4 silent-corruption bugs caught before merge).async_cross_encoding+ integration local-bounds + LS-F-27 gate tests (all verified to exist).list<list<string>>, #272 follow-up: deeper list nesting (list<list<string>>) — needs a recursive-copy restructure (scoped) #286), allow-set narrowed in lockstep to ≡ the emitter's transcode-set.Verification
Non-Tier-5 (safety YAML only) → no Mythos delta-pass.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code