Skip to content

reverting real coordinates - #163

Merged
campospinto merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
revert_real_coordinates
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

reverting real coordinates#163
campospinto merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
revert_real_coordinates

Conversation

@campospinto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The PR #156 defined domain coordinates with real=True argument. This is probably justified but requires additional testing as it breaks some calls to TerminalExpr. Here this change is reverted, and a dedicated PR will be reopened later.

@campospinto campospinto self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024

@e-moral-sanchez e-moral-sanchez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. I will take a look at this later on. Thanks!

@yguclu

yguclu commented Aug 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@campospinto @e-moral-sanchez What is the current status on this matter? Is there an open issue?

@campospinto

campospinto commented Aug 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@campospinto @e-moral-sanchez What is the current status on this matter? Is there an open issue?

I don't think so, but it would be good indeed to have one that describes precisely the problem.

Note that the previous PR #156 was breaking some calls to TerminalExpr of derivatives (returning zeros for non-constant functions), probably because the coordinate symbols were not properly identified. Some of the corresponding code is now tested in the (still open) PR #161, so that the problem can be detected at sympde level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants