chore(harness): 0.0.6 internals lane run record — PLAN-EVAL cycle 4 surface (not for merge) - #1553
Closed
rickylabs wants to merge 57 commits into
Closed
chore(harness): 0.0.6 internals lane run record — PLAN-EVAL cycle 4 surface (not for merge)#1553rickylabs wants to merge 57 commits into
rickylabs wants to merge 57 commits into
Conversation
…aselines Stage A/B of the topical milestone run for the 0.0.6 chores/internals lane (#1436, #1415, #1403, #1380, #1378). Records what was executed rather than what was assumed: identity/worktree proof, all five live issue bodies with a 30-box acceptance inventory, and the dispatch preconditions (runtime doctor, managed Codex daemon, live-turn provider verification) that milestone-run stage B requires as recorded output. The re-baseline falsified #1436's own prescribed fix: the word boundary it asks for is already present, and \b is why the defect survives, because '-' is a non-word character. evidence/probe-1436-baseline.ts is the executed proof, and it found a second instance ('un-fixed #555') the issue does not mention. Refs #1436, #1415, #1403, #1380, #1378 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…lanning events Wave 2 gets one plan (plan-quality-rail.md) with nine locked decisions and a fully executed baseline, because #1403/#1380/#1378 overlap on root lists, scan semantics, doctrine and architecture debt. Executing the baseline moved three numbers the issues assert, and each change alters the work: - quality:scan:repo is RED on main and has been for 7 consecutive pushes, so #1378's own gate box is unsatisfiable as written. Filed #1530 and inserted it before #1378. - arch:check:repo FAIL is 55, not the 53 #1380 recorded four days ago. - Five of #1380's six stale verdict rows name directories that never existed in this repo, so rename-vs-deletion is a false dichotomy for them. Also records PR-A's dispatch identity and the orchestrator's independent re-verification of the #1436 fix, the owner's add-then-withdraw of #1529, and a brief error the implementation agent caught by escalating rather than idling. Refs #1436, #1415, #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…the worklog Wrapping an attached Codex launch or resume in a shell timeout kills the slice at expiry. The launch wrapper did fire SIGTERM here; the thread survived, and the worklog wrongly recorded that as harmless. Surviving once is not evidence the practice is safe. Attached launch and resume now run unwrapped; bounded observation uses agentic:codex-watch --timeout-seconds, which expires without touching the slice. Also records that codex exec resume fails with a thread-store conflict while a thread is mid-turn, which is the mechanical signal for "not at a turn boundary". Refs #1436, #1415 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…rigger Both netscript-pr and check-close-gate's own repair hint say the labeled event triggers a fresh run. Neither ci.yml nor e2e-cli.yml lists labeled in its pull_request types, so the label creates no run and the hint tells the operator to do something that cannot work. Cost one verification cycle on PR #1527. Label first, then push is the rule that works, because the gate and the mirror read live state at execution time. Refs #1415, #1436 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
PR #1527 merged as 63cd1cd, closing #1436 and #1415 with all seven pre-merge gate checks passing and both issues auto-closed COMPLETED. Records three failure modes that cost real time (the ready-merge label not being a workflow trigger, the attached-slice timeout wrapper, and steering mid-turn), and one falsified assumption worth keeping: a cancelled expensive gate is not evidence the gate did not run. Both scaffold-runtime tiers first read as cancelled and resolved to real successes once only the latest run per check name was taken. Blocking on them would have manufactured a false red. Refs #1436, #1415 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
… caught The rail PLAN-EVAL (fresh Codex Sol high, opposite family) returned FAIL_PLAN on three findings. The consequential one is the orchestrator's own error: the plan asserted rfcs/ holds only a template and a README, inherited from #1380's 2026-08-08 measurement and never re-measured, inside a plan whose stated value is that it re-measured everything. Five numbered RFCs 0001-0005 are present at the plan's own baseline, so #1380's RFC divergence has already closed and its acceptance box means something different than the issue says. Also records that the A14 population is 53 sanctioned imports plus one real locally bound describe -- a live negative case the fix must still fire on, not a 54th false positive -- and that six acceptance boxes had no routed proof. Adds the supervision note that a stalled status label is not death: the refused resume with an active-writer lock is positive proof the thread is working. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Records the evaluator's artifact verbatim: six blocking findings, three should-fix, one advisory, with a re-measured baseline table and a full command ledger that retains its intentionally-failed exploratory commands. Two of its blocking findings are protocol gaps on the orchestrator's side: no research.md exists and worklog.md has no Design section, both of which plan-gate.md requires. Two are wrong locked decisions (R-6 creates a transient second source of truth; R-9 rests on repository state already false at the plan's baseline). One is the unresolved #1374 extractor collision, which plan-gate.md classifies as FAIL_PLAN because it forces rework. One is six acceptance boxes with no stated proof route, against a live denominator of 34 rather than the 33 the brief asserted. Independently checked and not accepted as stated: #1530's post-merge box already carries the [post-merge] marker, so it is excluded from the merge gate by the sanctioned mechanism rather than needing a verification issue. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Adds the two protocol artifacts cycle 1 lacked -- research.md and a Design section with 21 ordered file-scoped commit slices, each with a gate -- and answers every finding. Withdraws two locked decisions rather than editing them away. R-6 would have created a checked-in root list that the next PR replaces; a single discoverDoctrineRoots() introduced in PR-B and expanded in PR-C serves the same coverage predicate with one source of truth. R-9 rested on rfcs/ holding only a template, inherited from #1380 and never re-measured, when five accepted numbered RFCs are present at this plan's own baseline. Corrects the A14 decomposition: 53 sanctioned BDD imports plus one locally bound helper at packages/mcp/tests/service-endpoint-sources_test.ts:248, and zero live bare globals. Treating all 54 as import false positives would have shipped a fix that silenced the true positive too. Routes all 34 acceptance boxes, resolves the #1374 extractor collision by consuming that lane's parser rather than writing a second one, and makes the export audit fail closed because deno doc --json returned exit 0 while emitting 567 unresolved-type warnings. Rebuts one finding with evidence: #1530's post-merge box already carries the [post-merge] marker, which is the sanctioned exclusion mechanism, so it needs no verification issue. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Adds three re-planning events -- the FAIL_PLAN and its revision, the owner-authorized amendment of #1380 box 2, and the accepted cross-lane extractor dependency on #1374 -- and brings context-pack.md up to date with PR #1527 merged, PR-E inserted, and the four owner decisions now in force. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…arbitration Second FAIL_PLAN reaches the two-cycle limit, so implementation stops and the owner arbitrates rather than a third pass being attempted. Three findings are new information the rail had not seen: registering allowances would immediately invalidate the eight that survive PR-E, because none carries an issue id; R-3's fail-closed rule makes PR-D's own green gate unreachable against 567 measured deno doc warnings; and #1378 box 6 asserts a property of a diff, which a file scanner cannot observe. Four are the orchestrator's own sloppiness: the revised plan contradicts itself on wave membership after Revision 2 was appended rather than reconciled, the Design table claims 21 slices and has 20, the strictly-harder claim about #1380 box 2 was an overstatement, and the provenance conclusion ignored checked-in records that document rename or supersession. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
… every blocking finding Replaces revisions 1 and 2 with one document. Appending a revision is what produced the self-contradiction cycle 2 failed the plan for, so the superseded text now lives only in git history and the two verdict files. Resolves the three substantive design holes. R-3 scopes fail-closed to the measured intersection with declarations the any-rule inspects, because failing closed on all 567 deno doc warnings made #1378's own green gate unreachable. R-7 registers the eight surviving allowances against new umbrella issue #1545, without which #1378's linked-issue rule would red CI on day one. R-12 proves the same-PR budget-link requirement with one added step in the existing code-quality PR job, since a file scanner cannot observe a diff. Retires the two-step root transition: PR-B now performs the single move to discoverDoctrineRoots() with no interim list, which is what both cycles asked for. Reconciles the provenance contradiction rather than preferring one source. This repository's history begins at 317e4b5 on 2026-07-06 with 374 commits and already contains the plugin-*-core tier, so the supersession that arch-debt.md records really happened -- before the earliest commit here. Both records are true, and PR-C writes both per row. Also corrects the strictly-harder overstatement on #1380, fixes the 21-vs-20 slice miscount, makes every Design row file-scoped, and states that PR-D drops Closes #1378 if the extractor fallback moves box 3. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530, #1545 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…ail PRs Formal evaluation is no longer an orchestrator dispatch. PLAN-EVAL fires from the openhands + status:plan-eval pair; the initial IMPL-EVAL fires on draft -> ready unless impl-eval:skip; either reruns only by moving away from its status label and re-adding it. Consequences recorded for PR-E/B/C/D: no local IMPL-EVAL session is launched, no impl-eval:skip is applied to a PR that changes gate semantics, and the draft -> ready flip stops being a free way to materialise CI contexts because it is now an evaluator trigger. No violation to unwind -- this lane never dispatched OpenHands. The cycle-3 rail PLAN-EVAL was already running locally when the directive arrived, so it is left to finish and deliberately not duplicated with a label pair. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530, #1545 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…laim half true #1524 added openhands-phase-eval.yml, which does listen to labeled, while ci.yml still does not -- and ci.yml is what runs close-gate and the acceptance mirror. So netscript-pr's claim that applying status:ready-merge triggers a fresh run is now half true rather than false, which is harder to catch: a label does produce a run, just not the one that re-evaluates the close-gate. R-11 becomes a distinction instead of a negation. Also supersedes D-2's factual claim that #1524 was an open draft, and records that PR-E's surface and premise are unaffected by the two new main commits. Refs #1380, #1530 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…e decision Cycle 3 closed 6 of 10 cycle-2 findings with none unaddressed, so the plan is converging. What is not converging is #1378's premise. The evaluator refused R-3's deferral and measured it: 1,714 published symbol records contain unresolved type references across 3,945 occurrences, including 230/724 symbols in plugin-sagas-core. Warning text names the dependency module, not the published declaration, so warnings-that-touch-a-declaration was never a defined mapping. Export-reachability at this baseline needs a debt programme, not a slice. Second unimplementable premise: the scanner has only --allow-read, so it cannot verify that an allowance's issue is open and milestoned, and the planned proof would be satisfied by a parser accepting any issue number -- a test that cannot fail on the property the issue requires. Two factual corrections are mine: the sagas row was false (arch-debt.md:576-584 records the supersession) and the shared row omitted fd8259b, which deletes packages/shared. Both are the same class I was auditing #1380 for -- asserting an absence without running the probe that finds the presence. Refs #1403, #1380, #1378, #1530, #1545 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…efects Revision 4. #1378 and #1545 moved to 0.0.7 with written reasons; #1549 carries the provable half in 0.0.6. R-3 is withdrawn by rescope and R-7 drops the issue-id requirement, because the scanner has --allow-read only. Fixes the three defects cycle 3 left standing. E1 no longer asks a landed slice to have a red gate -- the RED evidence is the pre-change output in the PR comment. B1's coverage test now derives its expected set independently of the function under test, because a test that asks the implementation what to expect cannot fail. And the provenance rows are corrected: sagas DOES have a checked-in supersession record at arch-debt.md:583, and shared was deleted at fd8259b, both verified rather than taken from the verdict. The 374-commit figure is now pinned to the sha it was measured at. Refs #1403, #1380, #1530, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…sons Refs #1378, #1545, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
rickylabs
added
type:chore
Owner
Author
|
@openhands-agent model=openrouter/minimax/minimax-m3 output=pr-comment iterations=500 phase=plan head=ce011b5f157a3f90bfbbf2c6a9e4f25ff3a060bc Trusted base SHA: d7e2b67 use harness SKILL
Act as the formal PLAN-EVAL session for this pull request. Do not edit files, create commits, push, Return concise findings with exact evidence and required amendments. End with exactly one supported |
Owner
Author
OpenHands Agent — CompletedOPENHANDS_VERDICT: FAIL_RESCOPE Model: PLAN-EVAL · 0.0.6 chores/internals lane · cycle 4 (post-rescope)Identity
Scope summaryThe lane owns the 0.0.6 chores/internals work. PR-A (#1436+#1415, close-gate trust) merged at Findings (evaluated against ce011b5)F-1 — PASS — Rescope decision is recorded with per-criterion evidence
F-2 — PASS — Three cycle-3 blocking defects were repaired
F-3 — PASS — Plan-Gate checklist cleared for the rescoped surface
F-4 — FAIL_RESCOPE — Companion artifacts still describe the pre-rescope plan surface
F-5 — FAIL_RESCOPE — PR-E branch carries no committed slice
F-6 — PASS — Lane discipline preserved
F-7 — PASS — Verdict vocabulary used correctly
What this run must do next (not part of this verdict)The verdict below says the plan, as rescoped, still has stale resume prose (F-4) and no implementation has started (F-5). These are distinct problems with distinct remediations:
If the orchestrator treats F-4 as a follow-up commit on this branch (one commit, run-artifact-only, no workflow file touched), the next PLAN-EVAL cycle on the reconciled plan can return PASS. The cycle-3 owner directive explicitly allows a fourth cycle as the rescope cycle; the remaining rescope reconciliation is in scope of that cycle. Responses to review comments / issue comments
Remaining risks
Validation
SummaryThe owner-authorized rescope (D-17) correctly bounded the moved set, recorded per-criterion reasons, and replaced the cycle-3 blocking decisions with milestone moves rather than a fourth plan rewrite. Revision 4 of OPENHANDS_VERDICT: FAIL_RESCOPE Run: https://github.com/rickylabs/netscript/actions/runs/31588750658 |
…val path Opened the run-record PR #1553 as a draft surface and applied the openhands + status:plan-eval pair, after verifying the workflow's PLAN-EVAL branch does not test draft state. Dispatch verified from the posted trigger and run 31588750658 rather than assumed from a green workflow. Records the route shift: cycles 1-3 were native Codex Sol high, cycle 4 is MiniMax M3 over OpenRouter chosen by the phase dispatcher, not by orchestrator escalation -- which also makes it a genuine third opinion on a plan three Codex cycles have failed. Refs #1403, #1380, #1530, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…cle 4 F-4) Cycle 4 passed the plan itself -- rescope bounded and reasoned, the three cycle-3 defects repaired, and the Plan-Gate checklist cleared -- and failed on companion artifacts still describing the pre-rescope surface. That is the same sin as cycle 2 finding 6: the rail plan was reconciled and the documents around it were not. Six stale statements fixed: plan.md's three-PRs prose and its PR-D-closes-#1378 heading, worklog's expanded-in-PR-C port note, the rail routing table's #1378 and #1545 rows, the routing denominator, and two open decisions that read RESOLVED where the truth is WITHDRAWN BY RESCOPE. Calling a withdrawn decision resolved is the unearned-green wording this lane exists to remove. F-5 (no implementation committed) is expected at this phase and the evaluator says so; it discharges when PR-E dispatches. Refs #1403, #1380, #1530, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
rickylabs
added
status:plan
Recorded at the owner's explicit instruction; the rebinding rationale stays in drift D-31 and the live bindings in supervisor.md. Compliance verified rather than asserted: codex-status shows only sol and luna models and zero Fable sessions, and this orchestrator has spawned no Claude subagents for the entire run -- every delegation went to Codex Sol through the launcher, and the deep_analysis lane was never used. Nothing to unwind, nothing in flight. Also names the substitution that must not be made: the Codex-review lanes fall back to Claude Opus rather than a Codex model, so an OpenAI-authored change is never reviewed by an OpenAI-family model. Under a Claude squeeze that is the cheap move and the one the policy forbids. Refs #1403, #1380, #1549, #1566 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Supersedes part of D-26 on who cuts, not on the duty to report. This lane declares no canary and runs no publish step, per D-3, so nothing had to stand down. One coordination action was warranted: the fixes lane had told me it would bring a first-coherent-checkpoint recommendation to the owner once #1539 landed, and #1539 has landed. Notifying them that Canary.3 authority sits with the runtime lane prevents two lanes arriving at the owner with cut recommendations, which is the collision the directive guards against. Refs #1403, #1380, #1549, #1566 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…s nothing resumable The fixes lane pointed out that a SendMessage to a completed Fable evaluator would restart a Fable session without looking like a launch, and marked their wave-1 evaluator agents dead for that reason. Checked rather than assumed: every recorded thread in this run is openai/gpt-5.6-sol at one effort, no Fable thread id appears anywhere, and this orchestrator has spawned no Claude subagents at all. Nothing to mark dead. Keeping the general rule: a completed agent is a resumable agent, so "I am not launching anything" is not the same claim as "I am not starting a prohibited model". Refs #1403, #1380, #1549, #1566 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
PR #1567 merged at b79eca5, closing #1566. Merged by the release coordinator during a Claude 529 outage and re-verified here rather than accepted: main contains it, the helper is present on trusted main, both items are status:shipped. The deliberate follow-up is now valid and only now: the workflow shipped a transcription rather than an import, because importing a module absent from trusted main is what made the first attempt self-block. The general shape is that a change introducing a trusted-path dependency cannot also be the change that first consumes it. Refs #1566, #1403, #1380, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…d hold #1570 immutable Verified rather than accepted: #1570 touches zero fresh-ui files, the fresh-ui lock is untouched since #1558, and the failing step is the frozen type-check reporting a stale private lock. #1580 owns it and the runtime lane repairs it. Not absorbing it even though the fix is one line: it would put a packages/fresh-ui change on a .llm/tools gate-coverage PR, which is the class this lane's own pre-merge check 6 exists to catch, and #1570's diff would stop matching its stated scope. Immutability is the operative constraint -- #1570 is mid-IMPL-EVAL at c740ff6 and any push moves the head and invalidates the verdict, which this lane has already paid for twice. Sequence is verdict, then #1580, then sync, then re-run. Refs #1403, #1580 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…test #1580 closed on this lane's evidence. Two reusable rules came out of it. A one-sided after-measurement is an assertion; a control makes it evidence. The runtime lane had the green run, this lane had the red run at the head immediately before, and neither could produce the pair alone. And a merge-forward on another lane's PR is safe precisely when the owned paths are byte-identical -- one diff decides whether the same head move is harmless or verdict-destroying. That is why #1570 owes no re-evaluation despite its head moving mid-eval, where twice before on this lane it did. Also records the post-merge-marker versus Refs distinction for circular acceptance boxes, which went back the other way. Refs #1403, #1580 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
PR #1570 merged at e391f3a. Verified on merged main rather than inferred from the PR: arch:check exit 0 while now iterating 36 discovered roots, and quality:scan:repo exit 0. Green at 36 with A14 origin-aware is a materially different claim from the old green at 16 hand-listed roots, which excluded packages/cli and therefore hid 54 A14 findings. Three defects on one gate are closed: the root omission, the PR gate never scanning .llm/tools and skipping entirely on an empty set, and the two-dot range that enumerated other lanes' merged files. Records that R-5 moved into PR-B after the implementer caught the plan's incoherent split, so #1380 box 5 is implemented there and PR-C ticks it citing this commit. Refs #1403, #1380, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…history claim This checkout is shallow. 317e4b5 is the shallow boundary, not a root, and has canonical parent 6a4ca79. So every history-shaped probe I ran was unreliable, and my public rebuttal of the evaluator's F1 was false. Retracted on PR #1585 with the citations. The lesson is not "run more probes": I ran three and called them independent when they were three expressions of one premise -- that the local object graph is complete. Independence of method is not independence of premise, and a shallow clone breaks that premise silently. Fourth instance of one pattern on this lane, and the sharpest, because the wrong answer was stable across repetition and therefore persuasive. Withdraws the false framing from the rail plan and records the standing rule: check is-shallow-repository before any ancestry claim, and use the compare API for anything load-bearing. Refs #1380 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…ale match F1 was correct and my rebuttal was false. These worktrees are shallow, so 317e4b5 is the boundary rather than a root, and both shared-package commits are canonical ancestors per the compare API. Corrected across all three surfaces F1 named, with a diagnostic note so the next re-walk does not repeat it. The finding worth keeping is methodological: I ran three probes and called them independent when they shared one premise -- that the local object graph is complete. A shallow clone breaks that silently, so the wrong answer was stable across repetition and therefore persuasive. Also records gh-watch reporting a superseded verdict as terminal in 0s for the third time. Consuming it would have blocked a PR whose finding was already fixed. Refs #1380 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
PR #1585 merged at eb373db, closing #1380 with 13/13 boxes. Verified on merged main: arch:check:repo exit 0, closing an entry that had been DEBT_ACCEPTED red since 2026-06-21. Records honestly that it took two evaluator cycles because the orchestrator rebutted a correct false-done finding using probes run in a shallow clone. #1549 dispatched as the final slice, consuming #1537's extractFencedBlocks rather than writing a second fence parser. Refs #1380, #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Both escalations were contradictions in this lane's brief rather than defects in the work, and the implementer blocked on direction instead of resolving either silently. D-2 authorized: commit the generated agent-tools barrel, a mandatory derivative of the owned embedded tool change, with a second generator run proving an empty status. My gate list demanded that empty status while my boundary list omitted the file -- and this is the same coupling as D-22, which already cost PR-E a cycle and which I recorded and then failed to apply. D-1 authorized: fix exactly the three explicit-any findings the widened docs scan exposed, with sound narrowing and no casts, suppressions or allowances. A gate that deliberately widens coverage cannot ship red while deferring the first findings that widening exposes, so the fix is in scope by consequence -- and a fourth finding would not be. Refs #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
The D-1/D-2 authorization was refused with a thread-store conflict because the thread was mid-turn, and the turn-boundary watcher then observed the escalation record completing rather than the authorized work. On that basis I reported the work as in progress when no authorization had reached the agent and the head had not moved. D-9 already records that resume happens at the turn boundary and that active-writer is the not-yet signal. The failure was sending immediately on receiving a decision and treating urgency as a reason to skip the check. Rule tightened: after a resume, confirm delivery by a fresh agent message or a moved head before reporting on it. A zero exit from the wrapper is not delivery. Refs #1549 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…spective D-42: agentic:gh-watch reported success twice while doing nothing -- once on a rejected `--` separator, once exiting 4 with no token -- and both times the task notification read exit 0 because the call was wrapped in a pipe. A watcher is a wake-up mechanism, never evidence; verdicts get confirmed by matching the verdict comment to the evaluated head. Also records the good half of the same observation: the ready-flip double-fired the phase-eval dispatch 8s apart and both runs succeeded with exactly one trigger posted, which is #1566's fix confirmed in production on the next occurrence. Retrospective drafted while PR #1596's IMPL-EVAL runs; merge figures land at close. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
D-43: PR #1596's widened scanner imports ../docs/snippet-extractor.ts, but the consumer bundle enumerates files from consumer-tools.json with no transitive import resolution, so the installed quality/scan-code-quality.ts exits 1 with "Module not found". Reproduced locally. The reusable finding is the gate error, not the missing file: `gen:assets-barrel` plus an empty `git status` proves the barrel is current with respect to the manifest, not that the bundle is complete with respect to its own imports. It passed twice while the bundle was broken. The barrel gate is two gates and I had written only the first. Fix brief requires a third manifest category for module dependencies plus a closure test with a negative control -- not a tools entry with an invented symptom, and never a second fence parser. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Audited every relative import of every bundled tool: exactly one gap exists and it is this PR's own (quality/scan-code-quality.ts -> ../docs/snippet-extractor.ts), and the extractor itself has zero imports, so registering it terminates the closure with no cascade. Both facts go in the brief because a closure test failing for pre-existing reasons would have made it self-contradictory -- the brief error this lane has already made twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
… as a verdict D-44: with the automatic DeepSeek run cancelled and no IMPL-EVAL comment on the PR at all, gh-watch reported "TERMINAL PASS after 724s". The only VERDICT: PASS text on the PR is this session's own REVIEW comment. Consuming it would have merged a PR carrying a reproducible consumer-facing defect on the orchestrator's own certification -- the one thing the harness forbids outright. A verdict now requires all three: a [PHASE: IMPL-EVAL] comment, an author other than this session, and an evaluated head equal to the head under consideration. gh-watch wakes a turn and does nothing else. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…ion to F1/F2 D-45: the cancelled run did publish a formal FAIL_FIX, by editing the existing openhands-agent-summary comment in place. Two facts I had wrong: a verdict can arrive on a cancelled run (verdict_source=summary-file, written before cancellation), and it can arrive by comment edit rather than a new comment. D-44's rule -- keyed to a [PHASE: IMPL-EVAL] comment -- would have hidden exactly the verdict it existed to protect. Corrected to anchor on OPENHANDS_VERDICT: or the <!-- openhands-run --> marker's run_id, and to re-fetch before concluding "no verdict". D-44's substance stands; its rule is superseded. The verdict's F1/F2 independently match D-43, so the prepared brief needed only a mapping of its contracts to the two findings. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Adds the required ## SKILL chapter (the launcher's brief contract rejected the first form) and records that the authoritative FAIL_FIX confirmed the rest of the rail green by independent execution, so the correction is scoped to F1 and F2 only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…vidence cites D-46: the correction rebase put the branch on current main and orphaned the evaluated head 7264ce6, which PR #1596's body still cites in three places -- including the box-index 7 gate evidence that mirrors into #1549 and outlives the PR. The claim stays true; the pointer rots. An unverifiable gate evidence link is the same false-provenance class as the shallow-clone rebuttal, so the body's hashes must be refreshed to the corrected head before the mirror runs -- verified with `git merge-base --is-ancestor`, not by eye. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
… bug D-47: the authorized generation for head a1010e3 fired correctly and delivered no verdict -- toolchain bootstrap died on `socket hang up` fetching Deno, the same flake that killed scaffold-static 45 minutes earlier. "Generation spent" and "evaluation delivered" are different facts and only the second licenses a merge; a policy counting triggers rather than verdicts eventually merges on a flake. Re-entered the documented label lifecycle once, since a bootstrap that never ran the agent duplicates nothing. D-48: my replacement poller paired a marker from one comment with a verdict from another and reported FAIL_PLAN from an unrelated comment against a still-running run -- the same conflation I had documented one entry earlier. Parse per-comment; never grep two facts from a concatenated blob and treat them as related. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
D-49: `socket hang up` killed scaffold-static, the evaluator's setup-deno bootstrap, and close-gate inside 75 minutes. All three died before producing any work product, which is what separates them from task outcomes. Rules confirmed: read a red as transport only when the job produced nothing; recover with `gh run rerun` never a push, since a push invalidates the PASS bound to the head; `--failed` is refused while any job in the run is still in flight; and verify partial mutation (#1549 was 0/7 ticked) before re-running a job that runs after the mirror. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
…, retrospective Records PR #1596 merged at c7fc453 closing #1549, the fourth and last owned issue. All four (#1380, #1403, #1549, #1566) are CLOSED/COMPLETED, milestone 0.0.6, exactly one status:shipped each. Verified on merged main: quality:scan:repo exit 0 allowCount 8, arch:check 0, arch:check:repo 0, import-closure guard 3/3. Four more falsified assumptions (A-7..A-10): a clean regenerated asset does not prove the generated surface sound; a cancelled evaluator run can still carry a verdict; a spent generation is not a delivered evaluation; evidence pinned to a commit hash dies at the next history rewrite. Retrospective finalised: seven brief errors caught by escalation (three of them test-command permissions I wrote without running), four false verdict signals from my own supervision loop including one that matched my own review comment as the evaluator's PASS, and the transport flake window that consumed an authorized evaluation generation. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Records PLAN-EVAL N/A for a one-line prose fix, the independently reproduced main red at 6aee2b4, and the repo-wide sweep result: exactly one occurrence exists, with none latent outside the guard's published-closure scope, so acceptance box 3 rests on evidence rather than assertion. Two brief decisions are about not defeating the guard: a backticked issue ref would pass because inline code spans are stripped, and is forbidden; and the reword must add no factual claim, since the preceding sentence already states the whole mechanism. Also records that `git worktree add -b <branch> origin/main` makes the leaf track main, so a bare push would have hit main -- caught by the launcher's git-safety probe and fixed with `git branch --unset-upstream` before launch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
#1612 closed by 6b29d12; guard verified 4 passed / 0 failed on merged main, bare #1589 gone, repo-wide sweep 0. Unblocks #1599. D-51 records a failure mode new to this lane: a fenced acceptance-evidence block repeated in a phase comment as well as the PR body makes the mirror parse 6 entries for 3 boxes and fail on duplicates. box-index does not protect against this -- the mapping is per-box-per-document-set, not per-document. Caught by the local validateEvidenceMapping pre-flight before CI, now two-for-two. Also records the impl-eval:skip decision with its pre-committed condition and the verification of the prose against fresh-ui's import map, the PR-body claim the skip would have falsified, and resolving duplicate check names by the #1142 latest-run rule rather than by eye. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Final tallies: seven PRs merged, eight issues closed, 51 drift entries, every issue CLOSED/COMPLETED at milestone 0.0.6 with one status:shipped. Records the post-merge verification per claim, including the published-JSDoc guard going 3-passed-1-failed to 4-passed-0-failed on merged main, which unblocked #1599. Adds the two-failure-modes analysis of the acceptance mirror: exact-box-text brittleness (#1560) and duplicated evidence blocks (#1614) are different defects, box-index only fixes the first, and the local validateEvidenceMapping pre-flight is now two-for-two at catching both classes before CI. Adds the skip rationale for #1612 -- condition fixed before reading the diff, prose verified against fresh-ui's import map, the guard escape refused -- and a closing note on control PR #1553 including the status-taxonomy gap for a by-design non-merge record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01R1uTFgh4emCPxSs7m72Pqf
Owner
Author
|
[PHASE: CLOSE] [VERDICT: COMPLETE — closed unmerged by design] This PR was the 0.0.6 chores/internals lane's control surface: orchestration evidence only, no implementation, What the lane shipped — seven merges, eight issues
All eight are Verified on merged
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Run record and PLAN-EVAL surface for the 0.0.6 chores/internals lane. This PR carries orchestration
evidence only — the tracked run dir. It contains no implementation and no closing keyword, and it
is not for merge. It exists so the rescoped quality-rail plan has a reviewable surface that the
automated phase-eval path can key off.
Not to be flipped out of draft. Draft → ready triggers the formal IMPL-EVAL
(
openhands-phase-eval.yml), which is meaningless for a record PR. PLAN-EVAL fires from theopenhands+status:plan-evallabel pair, which does not require a non-draft PR.Scope
.llm/runs/release-0.0.6-internals--orchestration/#1530,#1403,#1380,#1549in 0.0.6;#1436+#1415already closed by fix(tooling): gate trust — the close-gate stops inventing requirements and the acceptance mirror stops absolving them #1527What is under evaluation — PLAN-EVAL cycle 4
plan-quality-rail.mdrevision 4, the rescoped rail plan. Three prior cycles ran on the nativeopposite-family route and returned
FAIL_PLAN; cycle 3 closed 6 of 10 cycle-2 findings with noneunaddressed, and its residue was in the issues' premises rather than the plan's structure. The owner
then authorized rescoping the issues.
What the rescope moved, with the measurement that forced it:
#1378boxes 1, 2, and the exported/local + linked/unlinked halves of box 8deno doc --jsonover 30 export maps: 3.733 s, exit 0, 567 warnings, 1,714 published symbol records with unresolved type references (3,945 occurrences; 230/724 inplugin-sagas-core, 174/487 infresh). Warning text names the dependency module, not the dependent declaration — so export-reachability has no deterministic attribution at this baseline. Separately, box 2 needs the allowance's issue to be open and milestoned, andscan-code-quality.tsruns--allow-readonly, so it cannot observe live issue state.#1545(all five boxes)#1378.#1549was filed to carry the provable half in 0.0.6: docs-fence scanning via #1374's extractor, thesoundness/type-fixture exemption asserted by rule,
--max-allowat the measured count, the same-PRbudget-link predicate in the existing
code-qualityjob, and typingdocs/site/reference/triggers/index.md:310plus its executable twin.The four things cycle 4 should attack hardest
written reason on its issue. Judge whether
#1549's remaining set is genuinely provable, or whether itinherits the same attribution problem in a smaller form.
317e4b509(2026-07-06, beta.5cut).
arch-debt.md:583records thepackages/sagassupersession andfd8259b76deletespackages/shared, both outside HEAD's ancestry. Revision 3 got two of these six rows wrong; revision 4corrects them. Re-probe rather than trusting the table.
deriving its expectation from the function under test, and a landed slice whose required gate was red.
Both are fixed; look for others.
#1530,#1403,#1380,#1549.Slices
69813c8f3research.md+ Design section —112c1676b,83adb228763cd1cd58), closing fix(tooling): close-gate closing-keyword parser matches inside words, inventing requirements it cannot satisfy #1436 + fix(tooling): acceptance mirror ticks a box whose evidence says "Pending" — it validates presence, not assertion #1415plan-eval.md,plan-eval-cycle2.md,plan-eval-cycle3.md#1378/#1545→ 0.0.7,#1549filed —ce011b5f1Validation
This PR ships no code, so it carries no code gates. The lane's executed gate evidence lives per PR:
#1527's
[PRE-MERGE GATE]comment recorded 7/7 withpr-checks15/15current-pass.Baselines re-measured for the rail, at
84dd44ae7:quality:scanexit 0 /allowCount: 7;quality:scan:repoexit 1 / 5 findings /allowCount: 10;arch:checkexit 0;arch:check:repoexit 1 /FAIL=55; 36 live units; 6 soundness tests; 12 type fixtures.Harness
.llm/runs/release-0.0.6-internals--orchestration/plan-eval(cycle 4). Not mergeable in this state by design —netscript-prforbids merging aPR whose
status:isplan-eval, which is correct here.drift.mdD-14). Cycles 1–3ran locally before that directive and are deliberately not duplicated.
Drift / Debt
17 entries in
drift.md. The ones a reviewer should read: D-4 (#1436's prescribed fix was a no-op),D-10/D-15 (
status:ready-mergeis not aci.ymltrigger, and #1524 made that documentation claimhalf-true rather than fixing it), D-11/D-16 (two
FAIL_PLANroot causes, including an unverifiedclaim of the orchestrator's own), D-14 (this evaluator policy), D-17 (the rescope).
No new architecture debt.
arch-debt.mdchanges are PR-C's deliverable, not this PR's.Definition of Done
This PR is a record surface and is not merged, so it has no completion claim to gate. The lane's
definition of done is in
plan.mdandmilestone-run.md§ Definition of done, discharged per leaf PR.