Please note in the documentation, that the ID is not the chip-id.
From the sample I was assuming that the id was the chip-ID, using it as a key in my database.
In fact it is a UUID that changes with every read of a sample.
I know that it was my assumption that was flawed, no real error in the code.
But the bme280 has a id that you can read via i2c (not implemented) which mislead me.
Please note in the documentation, that the ID is not the chip-id.
From the sample I was assuming that the id was the chip-ID, using it as a key in my database.
In fact it is a UUID that changes with every read of a sample.
I know that it was my assumption that was flawed, no real error in the code.
But the bme280 has a id that you can read via i2c (not implemented) which mislead me.