Skip to content

docs: link omniload's actual release tag, and the install extra - #143

Open
singhpratech wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/omniload-release-link
Open

singhpratech wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/omniload-release-link

Conversation

@singhpratech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The README said the backend ships "since its 0.17 release" but linked omniload's generic releases page, so a reader could not get to the release itself or see how to install it.

Which release first carried it, checked rather than assumed. Our merge commit cb49538c is dated 2026-09-17T13:57:29Z; the v0.17.0 release commit is 14:01:26Z, four minutes later. The adbcbridge extra is in pyproject.toml at v0.17.0 and absent at v0.16.0. So v0.17.0 is the first release with it, and the existing claim was correct — only the link was vague.

The install line is verified against PyPI, not just the repo: the published metadata declares adbcbridge<0.2,>=0.1.3; extra == "adbcbridge", and omniload's own full and test extras pull it in — their test extra means their CI installs adbcBridge.

One deliberate omission: v0.18.0 is tagged on GitHub (2026-09-22) but PyPI's latest is still 0.17.0, so the text says "carried by every release since" rather than naming a version a pip install would not yet get.

The README pointed at omniload's generic releases page. It now links
v0.17.0, which is the release that first carried the adbcbridge backend:
our merge commit is dated 2026-09-17T13:57:29Z and the v0.17.0 release
commit 14:01:26Z, four minutes later, with the extra present in that
tag's pyproject and absent from v0.16.0's.

Adds the install line, since that is what a reader wants. PyPI's metadata
for the published package declares the extra as adbcbridge>=0.1.3,<0.2,
and omniload's own full and test extras pull it in.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant