Skip to content

Completed BFS 1#1653

Open
sanjoli97 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sanjoli97:master
Open

Completed BFS 1#1653
sanjoli97 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
sanjoli97:master

Conversation

@sanjoli97

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Binary Tree Level Order Traversal (BTLevelOrderTraversal.java)

Strengths:

  • Correctly implements level-order traversal using DFS recursion
  • Good use of dynamic list creation when encountering new levels
  • Well-documented code with time and space complexity comments
  • Clean separation between public method and helper method
  • Handles null root case properly

Areas for Improvement:

  • The comment says "using DFS (recursion)" but the problem specifically asks for level-by-level traversal. While the output is correct, BFS (using a queue) is the more intuitive and commonly expected approach for level-order traversal. DFS produces correct results but is conceptually different from the standard level-order (BFS) approach.
  • Could add a small optimization: pre-allocate the result list size if the tree height is known, though this would require an additional pass.

Overall, this is a solid solution that correctly solves the problem with good code quality.

VERDICT: PASS


Course Schedule (CourseSchedule.java)

Strengths:

  1. Correctly implements Kahn's algorithm for cycle detection - a valid alternative to the DFS approach in the reference solution
  2. Good edge case handling (all courses have no prerequisites, no courses can be started)
  3. Clean code structure with helpful comments explaining the algorithm
  4. Efficient O(V + E) time and space complexity matching the reference solution

Areas for Improvement:

  1. The early return if (count == numCourses) return true; inside the while loop is redundant since you already check this condition after the loop
  2. Variable names de and in could be more descriptive (e.g., dependent and prerequisite)
  3. Consider adding a final check: if count != numCourses at the end, return false explicitly for clarity

Minor Optimization:
The early return inside the loop could be removed - the final return statement return count == numCourses achieves the same result more elegantly.

VERDICT: PASS

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants