Skip to content

completed binary search - 2#2353

Open
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master
Open

completed binary search - 2#2353
yashhh-23 wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
yashhh-23:master

Conversation

@yashhh-23

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Find the First and Last Position of an Element in given Sorted Array (findMinSorted.java)

</think>

Looking at this evaluation, I need to assess the student's solution against the actual problem requirements.

## Problem Analysis

The problem asks to find the **first and last position** of a target value in a sorted array, returning `[-1, -1]` if not found, with **O(log n)** runtime complexity.

## Student Solution Analysis

The student's solution (`findMin.java`) solves an entirely different problem: **Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array**. This is a completely different problem with different requirements.

### Critical Issues:

1. **Wrong Problem**: The student solved "Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array" (LeetCode 153) instead of "Find First and Last Position of Element in Sorted Array" (LeetCode 34).

2. **Wrong Return Type**: The problem requires returning a `vector<int>` with two positions `[first, last]`, but the student returns a single `int`.

3. **Wrong Functionality**: The student finds the minimum element, not the first/last positions of a target value.

4. **No Search for Target**: The solution doesn't search for any target value at all.

5. **Missing Edge Cases**: The problem requires handling cases where target is not found (return `[-1, -1]`), which the student's solution doesn't address.

### What Was Done Well:
- The code for the problem it solves is well-structured
- Proper use of binary search
- Good handling of edge cases within its own problem context
- Clean variable naming and logic flow

### Verdict:

**NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT**

The student must resubmit a solution that:
1. Returns a vector/array with two positions `[first, last]`
2. Searches for a specific target value
3. Handles cases where target is not found (return `[-1, -1]`)
4. Uses binary search to achieve O(log n) complexity

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

---

### Find the Minimum Element in a Rotated Array(sorted) (findPeak.java)
- **Strengths**: The student demonstrates good understanding of binary search implementation with proper low/high pointer management and boundary condition handling.
- **Weaknesses**: 
  - The solution addresses a completely different problem (peak element vs. minimum in rotated array).
  - The code doesn't handle the case where `mid == n-1` before accessing `nums[mid + 1]`.
  - Missing the key insight for this problem: the minimum element is at the pivot point where the array "wraps around."
- **Recommendation**: Study the problem of finding minimum in rotated sorted array. The key insight is that in a rotated sorted array, at least one half is always sorted. The minimum lies in the unsorted half. Compare `nums[mid]` with `nums[high]` to determine which half is unsorted.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

---

### Find the Peak Element (Find1stlast.java)
**Major Issue**: You've solved the wrong problem entirely. The problem asks to find a "peak element" (an element greater than its neighbors), not to find the first and last positions of a target value.

**Strengths**:
- Your binary search implementation is correct and well-structured
- Good use of helper methods for first and last occurrence
- Proper handling of boundary conditions
- Clean code with good variable naming

**What needs to change**:
1. You need to implement the peak element finding algorithm using binary search
2. The logic should check if nums[mid] > nums[mid-1] AND nums[mid] > nums[mid+1]
3. If ascending slope, move right (low = mid + 1); if descending, move left (high = mid - 1)
4. Remove the target-based search logic entirely

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants