Skip to content

docs/plans: graph-port plans (full rev 3; shadow-only Plan A rev 4, gate-blocked) - #417

Merged
MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
graph-port-plans-0903
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

docs/plans: graph-port plans (full rev 3; shadow-only Plan A rev 4, gate-blocked)#417
MaxGhenis merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
graph-port-plans-0903

Conversation

@MaxGhenis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds the two peer-gated graph-port plans from 2026-09-03 under docs/plans/ as records:

  • graph-port-2026-09-03.md — the full port plan (D1–D8), revision 3; Sol gate 20260903-093201 blocked after four rounds (eight open findings carried to Plan B).
  • graph-port-A-shadow-2026-09-03.md — the shadow-only Plan A, revision 4, folding the round-4 findings (source model, TCB attestation, evidence-grade closure carried to Plan B, storage checks, capacity; frozen oracles; evidence-complete vs parity-pass; H2 stopping rule); Sol gate 20260903-122500 blocked after four rounds.

Documentation only. No build work starts under either plan until the approval path is decided; neither plan changes gates.yaml, runs/, or any code.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…plan rev 3; shadow-only Plan A rev 4, gate-blocked, decision pending)

Records the two peer-gated plans from 2026-09-03: the full graph port
(D1–D8, gate 20260903-093201 blocked after four Sol rounds) and the
shadow-only Plan A (revision 4 folding the round-4 findings; gate
20260903-122500 blocked after four rounds). No build work starts under
either until the approval path is decided.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
social-security-model Ready Ready Preview Sep 4, 2026 12:25pm UTC

Request Review

@MaxGhenis
MaxGhenis merged commit 02c4301 into master Sep 4, 2026
10 checks passed
@MaxGhenis
MaxGhenis deleted the graph-port-plans-0903 branch September 4, 2026 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant