Skip to content

fix: reject impossible CALYPSO atom choices - #382

Open
njzjz-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz-bot:fix/issue-356-calypso-atom-choices
Open

fix: reject impossible CALYPSO atom choices#382
njzjz-bot wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz-bot:fix/issue-356-calypso-atom-choices

Conversation

@njzjz-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • compare nested atom-choice differences against an empty set correctly
  • raise ValueError before entering the random selection loop
  • add a regression test for [["Li"], ["Li"]]

Tests

  • PYTHONPATH=tests python -m unittest -v tests.exploration.test_make_task_group_from_config.TestMakeCalyTaskGroupFromConfig.test_rejects_impossible_random_atom_choices tests.exploration.test_make_task_group_from_config.TestMakeCalyTaskGroupFromConfig.test_caly_task_group
  • ruff format --check dpgen2/exploration/task/caly_task_group.py tests/exploration/test_make_task_group_from_config.py
  • isort --check-only dpgen2/exploration/task/caly_task_group.py tests/exploration/test_make_task_group_from_config.py
  • git diff --check

Closes #356

Coding agent: Codex
Codex version: codex-cli 0.149.0
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning effort: xhigh

@dosubot dosubot Bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. bug Something isn't working labels Aug 23, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

Next included review available in 59 minutes.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 312172fa-88f6-495e-b98f-c1dadf1af8c7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b01f29 and d3ca156.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • dpgen2/exploration/task/caly_task_group.py
  • tests/exploration/test_make_task_group_from_config.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Correct the empty-set validation so nested atom choices that cannot produce unique species fail before the random selection loop.

Closes deepmodeling#356

Coding-Agent: Codex
Codex-Version: codex-cli 0.149.1
Model: gpt-5.6-sol
Reasoning-Effort: xhigh
@njzjz-bot
njzjz-bot force-pushed the fix/issue-356-calypso-atom-choices branch from 5507103 to d3ca156 Compare August 26, 2026 11:00
@dosubot dosubot Bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 26, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.45%. Comparing base (6b01f29) to head (d3ca156).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #382      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.43%   84.45%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         104      104              
  Lines        6110     6110              
==========================================
+ Hits         5159     5160       +1     
+ Misses        951      950       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

wanghan-iapcm

This comment was marked as outdated.

@wanghan-iapcm
wanghan-iapcm dismissed their stale review August 27, 2026 04:12

Retracted. This review was produced without running the mandated /code-review fan-out (the loop skill's section 2); the substitute process used instead has since been shown to miss findings and, in one case, to state a verified-sounding falsehood. Re-reviewing properly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Code scan] Fix CALYPSO nested atom-choice validation to avoid infinite loops

2 participants